Can you explain to me which one is the free one?
Because last I've heard you can't get any of those phones for free unless you get into a 1 or 2 years contract, no matter if you pick Apple or Android.
And Google has its AdSense program, meanwhile Apple has the iAds.
So what are the differences?
Just the lack of support for window.onerror makes me think that they don't take web developers seriously.
With Acid3 they rushed to make the changes so they claimed to pass it, but implementing correctly features that are used everyday?, no way man, that ain't cool
I don't think that I've ever seen a demo page done by Mozilla that forced the user to switch the browser. They just state what it's being demo, some of those demos don't even work in the last public release but only on nightlies, but they allow you to test it with whatever browser you are using and many times they provide a video to show how it should behave if your browser did support that API.
If you bother to follow the link and click on any of the demos, you'll see that it opens a page with a description, and when you click the "view demo" button, you get the SAME message stating that you need Safari to view some HTML5 demos.
Wrong, the pages at http://developer.apple.com/safaridemos/ also state that Safari is required.
The average user will think that this "HTML5 thing" is just something of Apple and not a real Standard.
Have you tested an Android phone?
You can install an app from any place without the need to break the warranty of your phone. Your paid apps are stored in your google account so if you wipe and reinstall everything they are still there. Non-paid apps can be easily back-up in the SD and move them to your computer if you please.
Yes, those poor telecoms that gives their users free access to the internet must be paid back by Google. How does Google dares to provide content and expect the charity telecoms to be the only ones that pay for those bills. I'm outraged.
Wait a minute....
Then why my telecom is sending me a monthly fee?
Opera has released Dragonfly, their answer to Firebug
I propose a new betting pool: How long until an Opera fanatic claims Opera developed Dragonfly first, and Firebug is just a ripoff.
Actually before Dragonfly opera had a different set of developer tools, called Developer Console
Opera Developer Console
Opera now includes a developer console that can be added into the browser with many new features. The developer console includes new tools including DOM inspector, JavaScript inspector, CSS editor and HTTP header inspector.
Which were released 15 Nov, 2006, and on my research that is a year or so before firefox.
That's not a comparison for Firebug, it's their version of the Web Developer extension. Also, that's not a "year or so" before Firebug: oldest post in Firebug group is 18th Nov, 2006
No, you can't use Firebug with IETab.
But if you use the real IE, you can use the IE Developer tools, so I don't understand why a web developer would ever want to use IE Tab.
An Ada exception is when a routine gets in trouble and says 'Beam me up, Scotty'.
