Comment Re:Interesting. (Score 1) 485
That argument doesn't take the entirety of the situation into account. You're using the Broken Window Fallacy.
That argument doesn't take the entirety of the situation into account. You're using the Broken Window Fallacy.
Two thoughts.
1) Just because a video displays something beyond the perceived state of the art doesn't mean it isn't real. I know plenty of people that couldn't fathom the BigDog videos the first time they saw them.
I've worked in the personal robotics industry as well, and I agree with you: much of that footage must be teleoperated. Some of the tasks (feeding someone, selecting a beer from the fridge) might be autonomous behaviours but the overall combination is unlikely--it would be equivalent to someone breaking the sound barrier before the advent of the jet engine.
Still, just because you work in the industry and it doesn't seem possible doesn't mean you shouldn't CYA with some pretty serious qualifiers.
2) Please, please, please stop spreading the use of the word Roboticist. People who work with electronics aren't Electronicists. People who fix cars aren't Mechanicists. The guys behind the Manhattan Project weren't Atomicists. Call yourself a robotics engineer. If that's too many syllables for you call yourself a robot designer. If you can't be bothered to say five syllables. .
"Roboticist" just sounds like a term a 2nd grader would come up with while writing a short story for a sci-fi competition.
"I've seen it. It's rubbish." -- Marvin the Paranoid Android