I like to ask my kids- what would have happened to the United States if Thomas Jefferson and Ben Franklin were hooked on watching The Amazing Race or playing Angry Birds instead of reading history and writing the constitution? That couldn't happen to such smart guys, you say? What if they had been trained from early childhood to just sit and watch whatever was on the TV or to play twitch games instead of doing something constructive?

When I was a kid I built a lot of models, rewired telephones and I watched Star Trek. One scene that helped define my life was when Spock was apparently staring off into space, and Kirk asked: "Shouldn't you be working on that warp implosion equation?" (or something like that) To which Spock replied with utmost confidence, "I am."

I was so impressed with that, that I started looking for problems to solve and solving them in my head -- things like calculating the length of a train based on my speed in the car, the train's speed and how long it took our car to overtake it (this required having my dad match the speed of the train and then drop back far enough to accelerate to a steady speed to overtake it. Good thing I had accommodating parents!) I got so good at this kind of thing that I failed a math test (multiplying matrices) in High School. "But I got all the answers right." I confidently told the teacher. "Yes, but you didn't show any work, at all. There are only answers here. You obviously copied someone else's paper." I reminded her that I was the first to tun mine in, by a long shot. She begrudgingly gave me the 100%.

You can imagine that this skill helped out tremendously in software development.

All I have to say is, if you ever get bored, ever, then you're not doing it right, even if you don't have anything to play with but your wits. Temple run? I tried it once. Once. Boooooooring!

That's assuming municipal water is even available. You need to compare to desalinated water. I used to know those numbers but don't quote me. I think this is comparable, and far, far cheaper than bottled water.

However desalinated water produces copious amounts of brine and uses lots of energy -- two big problems. This wind thing seems far superior.

Agreed. They could learn a lesson or two from Toms Shoes. (buy a pair and Toms' donates a pair to a child in an underdeveloped country)
Consequently, when you add in the retail overhead, the shoes cost about four times what they *should* cost, yet people buy them like crazy. Kind of like Macs.

Did you know that Neanderthals had bigger brains than we do?
Do you know why? Because they had a working memory!

"Researchers at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology are trying to push 3-D printing technology even further. Their goals: create whole working machines and perhaps even buildings. Thus far, 3D printing has been used to make shapes of plastic or metal that can be assembled later. "

Right. How about this:
  http://www.physorg.com/news190873132.html -- printing structures on the moon.
  http://www.blueprintmagazine.co.uk/index.php/architecture/the-worlds-first-printed-building/
  http://hardware.slashdot.org/story/11/09/16/173210/Printing-a-Building?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Slashdot%2Fslashdot+(Slashdot)

Functional Machines:
  http://www.psfk.com/2011/03/3d-printing-a-lightweight-super-strong-bicycle.html
  http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=01e_1310566165

The list goes on...

(And -- RIght-on Nimbius!)
 

This presentation is pretty enlightening.

part 1 - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w9cReuRThxY
part 2 - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D3V-TCpX40c
part 3 - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uNk1S0w8q-Y
part 4 - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cxg33Swcz5A

The experts' guesses are compared to "random darts thrown by monkeys". Guess who is more accurate....

This is clearly a form of censorship, but it's not an illegal one. Amazon has a right to choose what they carry in their stores, just as any other store does.

There is a worse form of censorship happening in our schools that very few people seem to be aware of. I discovered this when my daughters collaborated to write a book. They are in first and third grade, and when the box of newly printed books arrived, they proudly tried to donate several copies to the school library. The school rejected them.

It was not because of content. The librarian and some teachers all read the book and thought it was fine, and a great example of accomplishment for the other kids. It was not because of price -- we were donating the books. The problem is, the school district only allows books from a specific set of publishers, and since this book was self-published, it could not be allowed in the school. I inquired about the publishers, and there were only three on the list (Scholastic being one, and I'm sorry don't recall the other two.)

Essentially, the schools don't have to censor anymore, they have outsourced that function to a few trusted publishers. In our case, this is a district-wide policy, other districts might be different.

I have a busy life and didn't have the time to become an activist for open libraries in the schools (but I truly wish I could). Instead, I managed to get the kids' book on Amazon and B&N (although not in an e-book format -- It's a picture book that doesn't migrate well to those devices.)

Regarding Kindles, distributors and censorship - the device is not totally dependent on the e-store. I have versions of my daughters' book on my own kindle and in Ibooks too. The formats for publishing on those devices is pretty well known (epub. mobi, pdf, etc.) Distribution is the problem, but only for the technically challenged who can't be bothered to manually transfer the title onto their device - even when it's as simple as sending an email (a service Amazon provides for their Kindles -- it's a slightly bigger challenge for iBooks, but only slightly. I don't have a Nook...)

But I can't hack into my kids' library so easily -- other than to provide books at home for them too. Is there a better solution to this problem? Ultimately, I don't think so. Does anyone have a different opinion?

"The solution is to get our population growth under control"

Thomas Malthus said the same thing over 170 years ago. He was right at the time, but ultimately he was wrong. (Research Malthusian Catastrophe) He failed to take into consideration the effects of technological innovation. Specifically, the Industrial revolution and the "Green" revolution which both saved the world from massive famines.

GM crops may be our next stepping stone, but we may not need it either. Review all the wonderful research of Hans Rosling (Watch the videos an Ted.com) the answer is clear. The best birth control is an educated girl. The best way to control family size is to control infant mortality, and that is best accomplished by an educated mother. The best way to bring about education reform and population control is through economic development, which is best accomplished via education... I'm sure you can see where this is going.

It's not speculation. It's been done. We even did it here in the US with the Tennessee Valley in the 1940's.

Not only that, but educated kids grow up to be problem solvers too. Let's make them part of the solution, instead of part of the problem.

What programs do we need? Only one, Education.
       

Even something as obscure as the Breast Drill - http://www.lowtechmagazine.com/2010/12/hand-powered-drilling-tools-and-machines.html#more

Apparently can still be purchased at Sears. http://www.sears.com/shc/s/p_10153_12605_00934093000P

According to Kevin Kelley, Technology never dies. -- http://www.econtalk.org/archives/2010/11/kelly_on_techno.html
About midway through this hour-long podcast, Kelly describes an experiment where they took a 100 year old Montgomery Ward Catalog, and managed to find everything in it still being manufactured somewhere.

I myself still manufacture ancient Catapults and Trebuchets, -- http://www.rlt.com/ -- both small model and full-sized machines. (Fortunately, I was NOT the maker of the drug launching catapult found at the Mexican border that was in the news recently.)

You forgot pineapple. Not pine, nor apple. It's actually a berry. Who's fart-brained idea was that anyway?

And while we're on the subject, can we PLEASE rename September, October, November and December? Or just move New Year's day to March 1st. to get the name-prefixes back in sync.

Jeez. No wonder our kids are so confused.

"The best way to get a bad law repealed is to enforce it strictly."
-- Abraham Lincoln

"But they occupy the same space."
      -- Steven Wright.

Nope, it didn't work 50 years ago either.

I'm a toymaker, and I had what I thought was a novel idea for a toy windmill. I had no intentions of patenting anything, but searched the patent database to make sure I wasn't infringing on anyone else. Sure enough, there was an application dated 2007, and an actual patent from another person dated 2005. I put my project away for a year, but on hearing that the patent office doesn't really check for prior art, I decided to do it myself.

I found more patents for virtually identical mechanisms, right down to specific gear ratios, dated 1986, 1933, 1915 and 1890. It gets better. Cornell university has a working model of the thing, made in 1827. I don't see how using a chain drive vs. mesh gears vs. push rods, or using six vanes instead of four vanes makes it a different invention. All these machines do exactly the same thing, and all are patented as windmills or machines used to convert a moving fluid to energy.

The system has always been broken. It's just more visible and more abused now.

I'd offer references, but my records are in the other office. (sorry).

My toys can be seen at www.RLT.com

Hey folks, we can't afford to watch TV anymore. Seriously, think about what would have happened if Thomas Jefferson, Isaac Newton, Albert Einstein, et al, spent their evenings vegging out to a boob tube. We've got some serious problems to solve! Global Warming, The end of fossil fuels, the looming threat of water shortages, population pressures.... Who's going to solve these problems if we're all catching up on The Amazing Race to Wast the most Time? Come on! If you can't do the chemical engineering, or nano-technology, you can at least help the kids get interested. How about improving education? Getting politically active? Raising public awareness? Not sure if the problems are real? Then put a bullet in your TV and go do some real research. Give yourself an education before you put on the apathy hat.

The house is on fire, are we just gonna sit around and watch it burn?

Google TV is an evil thing. Truly.

Yeah, I didn't expect my position to be popular, and I'm not saying Neil was a bum either. But he had a higher calling, and he rejected it to wallow around in his own humility.

Sure, as a teacher he was an inspiration to one classroom. But as how many more engineers and scientists and manned missions to the moon would we have had if Neil had allowed himself to become the celebrity we all wanted him to be?

How many kids went around wearing one silver glove and "moonwalking" instead of flying model rockets and learning about the planets?

How many kids would be wearing one silver glove and moonwalking if Michael Jackson had quit the Jackson Five to teach a choreography class somewhere?

Neil was the first person ever to step foot on a non-Earth ground. That's what it's all about. Second place is always a shadow of the first, and third barely counts at all. Neil had the ball, and he put it in his locker and went home.

Bad boo-boo waddy.

Neil Armstrong. What a disappointment he was. The first man on the moon, came back and disappeared into virtual anonymity.

How much farther would the space program be now if "don't bother me" Neil had instead stepped up to become the real celebrity he could easily have been? What if he had gone on to build and support his already dedicated fan-base, inspire and fascinate the kids and the public at large, making it easier for the politicians to actually fund space exploration and research?

But no, Neil dropped the ball. He SCREWED THE POOCH on the space program and left a vacuum in the celebrity-sphere that the public needs and wants to look up to and idolize. Who filled that space instead? Michael Jackson?

Neil. It's too late. You let us down. This policy is just as much your fault as Obama's. Neigh, more so. Go back to your little cottage and wallow in your privacy. You had a job to do and you didn't do it. You're fired from being my hero.