Comment Re:"last, gassy breath of a dying star" (Score 0) 38
Comedy 101: If you're going for offensive, you have to be funny.
Seriously, that was Limbaugh-esque in its complete laziness.
Comedy 101: If you're going for offensive, you have to be funny.
Seriously, that was Limbaugh-esque in its complete laziness.
No, they don't have any control over anything. It's only limited by your ability and desire to *pay* for that privilege.
Quit making up things that are not true. It lessens the real arguments, which are entirely economic in nature.
I love how you blithely limit the MPAA-members' financial clout to just their movie revnenue.
We're talking about Sony, Disney, GE, NBC Universal, Viacom, NewsCorp, and Time Warner here. They've got a lot more money than just the movie business, if they are so inclined to throw it around.
Aww, things I wrote 5 years ago now classify as "ancient"?
You cold, Internet.
I'm glad you brought the legal ramifications of this to Google's attention! Here they were just blithely going around instituting policies without any sort of labor attorneys providing counsel, so it's a good thing you showed up to set them straight (no pun intended.)
Seriously, though, as a straight guy, I would never complain about this. I'm not even sure you could win a discrimination lawsuit, since your net income is the same. But the tax is unfair, and I don't want to be the guy with "loves to take advantage of his privileged status" on his resume.
Since Google's entire business model revolves around advertising (and thus, customer targeting), while Microsoft, Apple (and Linux, in a fashion)'s business model revolves around selling OSes, I think it would be pretty easy for MS or Apple to simply say, "We will never collect any data about our OS users' application usage, browsing habits, or other personal information."
Google simply can't afford to say that. So no, not exactly the same thing at all.
Yeah, we have never elected Presidents and Congressmen whom we know to be cocaine users, adulterers, drunks, lechers, more-or-less murderers (Chappaquiddick), racists, sexists, anti-Semites, or just plain boors.
Oh wait.
She couldn't say so the person who stopped her? It's in her file, they could look it up if they didn't believe her.
I mean, this is a stupid rule put in place by stupid people. Don't add to the stupid.
I will bet $100 that the iPad and all of its following generations will not push 50 million units within the next 5 years, starting from the point of first sale. They simply don't have the versatility required to break out that big.
1) Take the date 3 months after the iPad is fully available in Europe and Asia.
2) Count the sales from that date 1 year forward.
It won't be anywhere close to the number of netbooks sold during that period.
Using the iPad's first quarter as some kind of predictive benchmark is foolish.
Not for nothing, but that actor autographing scans story was bullshit PR.
But I agree with you in general.
Pornography is defined at least here in the states as being primarily for prurient interests and having no social or artistic value.
Heck, Wales uses the same criteria in the summary.
So Venus de Milo wouldn't count.
What else do you got?
The worst one for me is that they've moved the DVD section (almost all family-oriented) of our grocery store into the breakfast ceral aisle. So now every parent taking their kid to get cereal has to say "No" to all of those DVDs.
Terribly frustrating.
But I would never want government to say a grocery store can't do this. I can always choose another grocery store if it gets ridiculous.
First, "regulating everything" does not equal "massive government control." In fact, government's first and foremost job is to "regulate everything."
Secondly, that Obama has a philosophy of massive government control is news to me, I haven't seen anything to really indicate that that's the case, care to expand on that?
First off, they do NOT have that right, because that would be an illegal restraint of trade.
You don't seem to understand that the basic concept of a "free" market involves things like "no extortion." So if Apple had the monopoly on smartphones, and went to Best Buy and said, "Either you stop selling Windows PCs or you can't sell any smartphones," that is an illegal restraint of trade, and that we as Americans WANT exactly that to be illegal. We don't want anyone to be able to get to the top, monopolize it, and then stifle innovation or competition through restraint of trade. They ALWAYS need to be competing for our business and our capital.
We want fair competition on all products, THAT is how a free market grows and prospers.
An Ada exception is when a routine gets in trouble and says 'Beam me up, Scotty'.