Comment Re:Yes, .. because (Score 1) 782
it remembers me of "Solar Jetman - Hunt for the Golden Warpship".
it remembers me of "Solar Jetman - Hunt for the Golden Warpship".
Well and I will introduce to you, the fourth group you probably missed out, but which is well represented on
- 4.) Those who use XP since it has matured, and strip it down with nlite, tweakui etc..,
Those who used Win2k for a long time, those who also use/used Linux and/or FreeBSD,
those who are tired of ever changing Desktops through "UI-devellopment", those who are tired of being said that
they can unset all the blinky transparent shiny clumsy slowingdown addition to KDE but are tired to do it to go through every
configuration interface of Kontrol to gain back a desktop which is fast and not a bonfire of graphics,
those who like their Win-explorer/commander like setting for file browsing, no special media treeview etc.. by default
WE JUST WANT A BUTTON "VISTA & MAC influences burn in hell", and perhaps a button
"win2k/xp looks good, and KDE can do too"
- desktop
files on it, quick links, simple Clock and everything else must be add on,
a "System Control" Mandrake had in it's days it was called Mandrake (9/10.X)
btw. and even if a distribution delivers this, we want a consistent packaging system,
not to be bound to ever changing incompatible versions subversions and subsubsub-versions,
the --force tag is annoying for a 1.2.3_2 Version to match 1.2.3 requirement,
hey dll hell lol, rpm/deb/etc..-hell is worse
running FreeBSD/Linux as a serverOS for 10+ years now, and for 5+ years solely FreeBSD,
those systems are wonderfull,
but to go back to the topic, I don't use bing, I don't click on adds, I use an add blocker and
crush google cookies.
I judge this post myself offtopic, but I think those things had to be said, one time or another.
The only possible interpretation of any research whatever in the `social sciences' is: some do, some don't. -- Ernest Rutherford