Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Good (Score 1) 93

Xen dom0 patches are available for 2.6.27, 2.6.29, 2.6.31, 2.6.32, 2.6.33 etc..most people prefer 2.6.32 atm, since that's the long-term maintained kernel from both kernel.org and xen.org. For more information: http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/XenDom0Kernels . Xen developers are also busy preparing (and rewriting) the Xen dom0 support for the mainline Linux Xen pvops framework, which has been in upstream Linux since 2.6.24.

Comment Re:Xen needs to improve (Score 2, Informative) 93

This has changed pretty much lately. A lot of new documentation has been written to the wiki, for example: http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/XenCommonProblems has a lot of stuff and links to other new documentation pages. Have you heard of XCP (Xen Cloud Platform, http://www.xen.org/products/cloudxen.html)? It's a full "Xen distribution" featuring install CD, including everything needed for multi-host/pool management. No need to install custom kernels or anything. You can use OpenXenCenter (http://www.openxencenter.com/) to manage it, if you need a GUI tool.

Comment Xen support in Fedora 13 (Score 1) 93

Fedora 13 contains Xen hypervisor and tools, but it doesn't contain rpm package for a Xen dom0 capable kernel. There are unofficial Fedora rpm packages for a Xen dom0 capable kernel, based on the upstream pvops dom0 kernels (Linux 2.6.32). More information about Fedora Xen status and links to rpms see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/XenPvopsDom0 . More information about available Xen dom0 kernel options see: http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/XenDom0Kernels .

Comment Re:KVM catches Xen (Score 3, Informative) 93

Some comments.. Xen hypervisor (xen.gz) is not meant to be integrated to Linux kernel. Xen is designed to be a separate piece of software. Xen is a secure, type-1 baremetal hypervisor, not a module for Linux. Xen dom0 ("service console") can be Linux, NetBSD or OpenSolaris. Most people use Linux as Xen dom0. When Linux is used as dom0 it needs to be able to run as Xen dom0 (obviously) - and this is where some people have had pain. For a long time the official Xen dom0 kernel patches were only available for Linux 2.6.18. This was difficult for many people and caused some distros to drop Xen dom0 kernel support because they couldn't affort porting the patches to newer kernels themselves. Today the situation is different. Xen developers are actively working on rewriting the Xen dom0 patches based on the (already existing) upstream pvops framework. pvops has been in the upstream Linux kernel since 2.6.24. Xen pvops dom0 patches are available today for the long-term maintained 2.6.32 kernel, and also for 2.6.31, 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. Novell has also forward-ported the old/traditional Xenlinux patches from 2.6.18 to first 2.6.27 and also to 2.6.31, 2.6.32 and 2.6.33. So there are many options today. For more information about the various Xen dom0 kernels see: http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/XenDom0Kernels Also xen.org offers XCP (Xen Cloud Platform) which is a full platform, including installation CD and multi-host/pool management. If you use XCP you don't need to install custom kernels or anything - you get all included in the XCP bundle. More information about XCP: http://www.xen.org/products/cloudxen.html

Comment Re:does KSM mean the death of Xen? (Score 1) 195

If KSM puts the KVM module on par with Xen in terms of performance then I think the writing is on the wall for Xen's demise.

No. Not at all. KSM saves memory but hurts performance. It shares memory across virtual machines to save memory.

Xen can't share memory across virtual machines, it's just not put together like that.

Performance is about identical for KVM and XEN.

Actually Xen has some form of memory overcommit nowadays.. check tmem patches from Oracle. I think they'll be part of upcoming Xen 4.0 release.

Slashdot Top Deals

There are two ways to write error-free programs; only the third one works.

Working...