You're absolutely correct - most of the vehicles on the page are unmarked highway patrol, a few detective vehicles but nothing I would consider 'undercover'. If they were undercover they wouldn't be in a vehicle that has radios and lights installed, they'd be using portables.

There isn't really any problem here, this is just the Vic Police overreacting. The vehicles are 100% obviously cop cars, with exactly the same antenna and will always have some form of lightbar inside or outside the vehicle. Anyone who can't spot an undercover cop in Australia needs their eyes checked.

You say that as though I read the summary.

Sure, if by 'security threat' you mean 'economic threat', and by 'United States' you mean 'Motorola'.

Just in time for tax!

Also, what a terrible article. Shaky camera is shaky, and what is the "U of O"? Is that some kind of alien craft?

It's a Canadian story published in Canada about Canadian researcher. What did you expect, a US flag?

Thanks for the tip - I always seem to get incorrect advice from "mechanic" mates.

I believe it also keeps the fuel line cleaner to use up the older petrol before dumping new petrol on the top.

I own a non-mobile wallet, it's called a safe.

My wallet is already mobile.

When security vulnerabilities are discovered in a piece of software (that is not open source), the release of that information may be delayed to allow sufficient time for the developers to patch the vulnerability. This organisation is basically asking that the release of this information be delayed until such a time as it is irrelevant. The problem we see with this is that people will always find the unreleased vulnerabilities, and it is entirely possible that this will happen in this case, but it would be a bit more catastrophic than a 0-day IIS vulnerability.

Only if said victim country wasn't already the US' bitch.

Even if they did say anything, would anyone believe them?

Would almost certainly be for tracking individuals. Sounds similar to a DARPA project.