Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Depressing, but not uncommon (Score 1) 1251

They actually do track these things. It's reported under "Alternative measures of labor under-utilization" Here's the latest report I can find right now

So In July 09 it seems that the "count everyone" unemployment rate was 16.5% with the "official" rate was 9.5% That includes discouraged workers, Those who took part time job and anyone else classified as a marginally attached worker.

Comment Re:See also: The classic answer to computer proble (Score 1) 214

>>What sort of security do you put on your backup infrastructure?

It depends.

I guess it depends how valuable the data is, how current it needs to be. Does it need to be kept secret or simply kept uncorrupted? How fast do you need to access these backups. The harder for you, potentially the more secure.

For starters let's have a copy off-line in a location where the servers are not. Heck, choose another location for more security. I am thinking: A tape and a DVD in a safe with a lock on it. And another somewhere else.

If you really need to keep it safe, commit it all to memory and then shoot yourself in the temple.

I think you are missing an even bigger problem. How many of your servers does your backup infrastructure have admin access to - or if not admin elevated access? Are your backups a push or pull? If they are a pull you now have INBOUND firewall rules from your backup segment into your other network segments allowing the backup server to talk and start the pull. Or if you have a backup segment, there is not firewall protection, except host based firewalls, which have rules to allow the backup server to talk.

Yes having multiple copies is a good idea, but backups are a very dangerous thing security wise if not done right and secured properly.

Comment Re:How Many applications? Re:Who reboots? (Score 1) 440

I don't have any issues with boot time in windows 7. It's up and running in about 20 seconds ... of course this is on an i7 proc w/ 6GB or ram and 15k Velocerapter drives

And how many applications are installed? Unless MS does something amazing, once you finish installing Office, windows boot times traditionally go out the window. And every application thereafter makes it worse. Also, keep in mind that what people are perceiving as boot time is from off to a useable state. For a server this means off->services running. For a user PC this means Off-> Fully Logged in and can launch applications.

Actually quite a few - I use it as my main work machine now with an XP laptop as backup. The full office suite, all of my remote admin tools, VMWare Client, Im, etc. using your definition of usable: fully logged in and can launch applications, my machine is usable in about 30-45 seconds from off and this includes the time it takes me to enter my username/password at 9am before i've finished my first cup o joe. I'm actualy working in about 3-5 mins from boot, outlook up, im up and possible a few ssh sessions and RDP sessions going, depending on what i need to check in the morning.

Comment Re:Servicedesk+ (Score 1) 321

I second this, We have two instances, one for Ops and one for Development. Especially with the new release it is a decent product for Small to medium sized shops. The free version only lets you have one tech though, but it's a cheap product to buy between 1k and 5k/year depending on which version you buy and how many techs you need.
Censorship

Submission + - Domain Registrars Censoring the Internet

An anonymous reader writes: Domain registrars and hosting providers routinely take sites off line when the contain illegal content, or are involved in spamming or fraud. These companies assert an absolute right to make these decisions without oversight, and we just assume they are right.

So, what happens if they are wrong?

Writing here the owner of a bittorrent site describes how two different Registrars/DNS Hosts have blocked the site, even though the actual host has no problem with it.

No big deal, right? Because bittorrent is illegal, and anybody using it must be involved in piracy. At least that is apparently the logic of the DNS providers DynDNS and Sitelutions.

In fact, the owner, who goes by the handle "Dr.E," says that the site is a "bittorrent news site. We do not operate a tracker, we do not host any torrent files, or directly link to any torrent files." He says that "I personally am a strong advocated for copyright law reform, and the site does encourage users to take full advantage of their rights to use material within the law, but those positions are completely legitimate, and espousing them is constitutionally protected free speech."

There is a big difference between opposing piracy and supporting censorship, and when some of the largest registrars are actively involved in censoring the internet, it should make people take notice.

Slashdot Top Deals

All seems condemned in the long run to approximate a state akin to Gaussian noise. -- James Martin

Working...