they might sell your data and give you access again from the earnings they do :)

creativity is to be shared but also protected because usually the artist wants credit for it. now if you are keeping things in "the cloud" (independend who is providing it to you, be it apple, google, adobe, ...) and you intend do work on them, you have to ultimately trust the owner of the clouds servers on your data staying your data. making a small website with holidays pictures is one thing but working with real data for high payed contracts i would never just put the data anywhere in a cloud... after all winds can carry clouds anywhere.

isn't that already happening?

a DVD has smaller frames inside compared to a blueray - whereas the texture and 3d structures a game is shipped with is the same... no game will show you a different 3d object with more detail simply because you are on higher resolution

16:10 was the standard before the industry decided that 16:9 is actually cheaper to produce http://mybroadband.co.za/news/hardware/17621-widescreen-monitors-where-did-1920x1200-go.html http://www.displaysearch.com/cps/rde/xchg/SID-0A424DE8-28DF6E59/displaysearch/hs.xsl/070108_16by9_PR.asp

does it matter that much if you play on a 4k or 2k screen? the games graphics are anyway not distinguishing between single pixels and the textures are not optimised for 4k. if you would play 2k side by side to 4k (now keeping aside the GPU power), would you realise the difference? 4k makes significant difference for photography and video!

kickstarters to sponsor marketing of the product of their company? wow, these guys are smart!

what would Ron Finley http://www.ted.com/talks/ron_finley_a_guerilla_gardener_in_south_central_la.html make out of these plants (assuming they somehow produce enough light when needed)?

glowsticks http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glow_stick have no luciferase inside, sorry. most of them are actually very much void of proteins.

Genome Compiler is a nice tool, but the luciferase gene is since long available to molecular biology and can be just put in the right vector for expressing it in the plants... why making everything more complicated? or do the authors just want to buy the fancy genome complier software for something else? ;)

this project does not show any calculations as of where the plants should aquire enough energy to give enough light when needed. to get 1000 lumen from a source, one has to generate enough photons first. also the heat produced goes where? is it not harmful to the plants? nobody yet has evaluated or tested what goes on exactly when you have a plant producing light and also consuming it at the same time. ... and we also do not know how our bodies like the firefly luciferase when consumed - any firefly eating people around to enlighten us?

this is for sure an interesting movement. an old system (from the time of renaissance, IIRC) rediscovered and implemented with modern means.

what i find really interesting is how such a crystoptical system (origami lens sounds misleading and quite wrong, sorry) behaves in phase contrast transformation... if it's just mirrors of molecular thikness layers, then i would think that even aberrations can be eliminated... and this would lead not only to cheap mini-objectives but also to excellent reproducing objectives for professional photography... especially in the wide-lens range, where good optical systems are hard to make.