They aren't without these special rights, absent marriage, they don't NEED these special right, now are they applicable.

Yes, pretty sure allowing gay people to marry is a major step toward enslaving us. Moron.

It's always Sharia with you morons.

I frankly expected Scalia to write 'Actually, it's about ethics in game journalism!' in that dissent.

I agree.

He's new around here.

The irony burns. "There has existed since before the founding of the American Republic a modern legal classification of married which conveys upon you certain rights and privileges." Right. So let's deny those rights to others because reasons! And no, I don't give a fuck what the 'Founding Fathers' would have thought about it. No more than I cared that they owned slaves.

Right. /. the domain of progressives. Pull the other one, it has bells on.

Great. Enjoy arguing with yourself. Some of us couldn't care less what religion has to say about denying people human rights. To paraphrase Jeb Bartlett, should I be able to sell my daughter as a slave? How about executing anyone who works on Sunday?

Who gives a fuck what religion says about it? I'm not a member of any of those three religions.

Pretty sure he knows what's in the constitution.

Of course. Because the people that do that think every single thing they personally don't like is judicial activism. Face it, a conservative court just affirmed gay marriage.

Amazon has moon maidens?

Of course it will be programmed to maximize sales.

Technical books are one thing, but Amazon reviews of fiction are pretty close to worthless. I've seen books with all 5 star ratings that are not even functionally literate.