Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Pathetic (Score 1) 302

You're right, but do you honestly believe the government could have that kind of collusion with companies and ISPs without the public having a greater uproar? I think the reason the average person doesn't care now is because it doesn't matter now. It could be abused, but I have faith that market forces, right to protest, judicial systems, and democracy would see that wouldn't happen rampantly.

Every time a technology is introduced to make the world look a little more Orwellian (and I hate the word) or not, there is a lot of discussion/dissent and backlash and the net result is positive. We (assuming you are from a 'Western'/modern country) live in a time where personal freedoms and liberties are higher than ever before, why wouldn't that trend continue? We have been faced with technologies which people thought would oppress us, and it has never stayed.

Anyway, those are my thoughts on it. To your credit and those who think like you, at this point in the game, it's harder to say exactly what will happen. I respect you for arguing for your freedoms.

tl dr; My only point is that TPM/TC is a technology, not a conspiracy. People are the ones who are oppressing, not technology, and oppression has a poor track record.

Comment Re:Pathetic (Score 1) 302

I'll make an informative post.

A TPM or Trusted Computing scheme is a way to have a very difficult to modify part memory in the CPU where private keys can be stored. It does not mean trusting the user or trusting the machine, it is a way for the machine to verify software signed with a private key has not been altered. Period.

Obviously, Like all security (perhaps excluding quantum cryptography without a lot of luck) it can be broken. However, the idea is to make that break valid for one machine (keys are different, unless the generation scheme was broken with some fancy crytography) and involve a lot of time (like looking at the circuitry through an electron microscope.

As the GP said, there is potential for abuse. If you feel that this may happen, why would you run an OS that would want to abuse you in this way? If MS makes it so that Windows requires a TPM and scans your computer every minute, and that can't be disabled (as Windows would be modified/stop running), run Linux. A computer with a TPM (which, btw, have been out for awhile, you may already have one) doesn't require a "signed OS" or anything like that. That would be stupid, and would not actually work (as then the TPM would have to have knowledge of how the rest of the machine is running, which would mean that the chain of trust is broken, and the whole scheme could then be much more easily broken).

Comment Re:Pathetic (Score 1) 302

As the other poster said about Intel VT, and XP-mode is only available in Windows 7 Ultimate and Enterprise (i.e. the VLK version of Ultimate). It does not actually come with Windows 7 Professional, which most people would see as the business version. It does not come with Windows 7 Home Premium, which is what most end users would have.

The greatest problem Windows has is their licensing scheme and the people behind it. Engineers and developers do not run that company.

Comment Re:Is Wind up and running? (Score 1) 104

They operate in Calgary, but haven't yet expanded the coverage to actually include all the edges of this sprawled out city. Their map said "Coming in late 2010", but I haven't heard any updates yet. People at the Telephone Booth also suggested their downtown coverage isn't great (owing to buildings), but I haven't tested that.

Comment Re:More Data Please (Score 1) 417

The only time I've gotten stuck this winter was when I drove up to Edmonton a month ago to visit friends at uni (stuck in deep snow on a residential road, pushed out). The comparison of winter between Calgary and Edmonton is hilarious :P

Oh, and parking at WestEd the weekend before Christmas is ... insane.

Slashdot Top Deals

For large values of one, one equals two, for small values of two.

Working...