Not quite true, stating that the United States of America is the only country in the world that can hold elections without any form of violence is quite possibly the biggest pile of cr*p I've ever read.
The United Kingdom, while not holding your "sacred document", still holds peaceable elections every 4 years, or less, depending circumstances and in the most recent case, because our prime minister resigned.
New Zealand still holds peaceful elections regularly, as does Australia, Germany, Austria, Sweden, and countless more western countries. Don't even mention France, as we all know they like to burn things and throw tantrums anyway. ^-^
In fact the only countries I can think of who don't hold peaceful elections are run by despots or dictators. North Korea?
You are free because you think you are free. You are free because your government wants you to think you are free. No more, no less.
Never said anything about violence and you stated my point of the matter the other countries can have their government voted out with a vote of no confidence. We have them every 4 years while most countries do follow the same practice many do not make full terms of their governments all the time. Again the point being the no confidence vote which dissolves the government we do not have that.
Will change mean that people can have a rabid hatred of Obama as people had of Bush and still be free?
Yes. As long as you keep it civil.
Why do I have to keep it civil many people I met that were against Bush would almost foam at the mouth. I agree civil is something we should be to all people all the time but why do you have to tell me?
New York... when civilization falls apart, remember, we were way ahead of you. - David Letterman