Submission + - Should US science funding be protected from coming (standwithscience.org)
sbrinton writes: " New York Times and Scientific American blogs have picked up on a grassroots effort by graduate students to rally the public behind a petition in support of science funding. In the face of potential science funding cuts at the hands of the debt supercommittee, they point out that federal R&D spending is 5% of the budget, while innovation produces 60% of US economic growth.
They also say that no matter what career path--academia, industry, business, government--grad students take, they represent an important investment in human capital. With 60% of university research paid for by the feds, a cut to federal funding is a cut to the education of the nation's talent.
Should this absolve science funding from the budget ax, as congress attempts to get the federal budget under control?"
They also say that no matter what career path--academia, industry, business, government--grad students take, they represent an important investment in human capital. With 60% of university research paid for by the feds, a cut to federal funding is a cut to the education of the nation's talent.
Should this absolve science funding from the budget ax, as congress attempts to get the federal budget under control?"