The problem is you're not in a position to be able to evaluate the evidence - climate science is difficult and specialised.
I don't agree, but what if this is the case? You expect me to believe someone who cannot explain how they reached their conclusion? That is religion, not science. Why should I believe your religion instead of someone else's? Do you believe it because of how it makes you feel? Is it because it makes you feel like you are part of an important mission?
No, you believe them because they're an expert in their field and they agree with 97% of the other experts in their field.
It's a complex system that is not possible to understand without a lot of background in the field - like open heart surgery, or programming the SSL library. At some point down the line in day to day life you're going to have to trust that the person who is an expert knows what they are talking about.
Of course, the expert could explain to you how they reached their conclusion, but you'd quickly get lost because they would assume that you knew various other important building blocks necessary to understand it - like a background in science, for example. Just because he can't explain it to a layperson in a few short sentences doesn't mean that they're lying. It *might*, but at that point you seek assurances from other people who are experts in the field.
This is not about religion - and that fact that you are trying to paint it as so is a huge non-sequitur. Religious beliefs cannot be proved. Scientific evidence can be - but often it is not as trivial as opening a box and saying "here it is". That does not make it wrong, just complicated.
Do you say the same thing to your doctor before they perform major surgery on you, or do you trust that they are a professional in their field and that 97% of other doctors would agree with them on how to perform your operation?