I'm not saying torrent sites shouldn't be moderated, just that the site's owners should shy away from doing it themselves. Any site of sufficient size can be reasonably moderated by its users and there are plenty of ways to allow users to flag bad torrents. Also, I don't see any problem with having generic "top 20" lists for specific categories (preferably user generated); you just shouldn't (effectively) call them "Top 20 Copyrighted Hollywood Blockbusters" as you are acknowledging and condoning their existence.
... it seems like Fung's downfall was his own arrogance. The judgment states that Fung's failure to filter out copyright content alone would not have been sufficient grounds for contributory infringement. Contributory infringement was established because, in addition to this, Fung made forum posts detailing how to rip specific copyrighted works for his site and suggesting search terms to help find specific copyrighted works on his site. He also bragged about having certain copyrighted works available on his site and facilitated access to such content via top 20 lists.
Seems like other torrent sites should take note. Never acknowledge the existence of copyrighted content on your site or specifically facilitate access to it (e.g. "top 20" lists) or use copyright suggestive terminology (e.g. "blockbuster") or profit from your site, and you might just escape unscathed. You want to offer about as much assistance as google does when searching for torrent files. Do this and the 5% legitimate content might just save you.
The problem is specific to C++. There is a good thread about these problems here. MS has tried several hotfixes, but none of them have really fixed anything. They gave up when VS2008 was released, which is marginally better, but still not as good as VS98. Here's hoping they'll get it right in VS2010...
You've actually seen intellisense work? I program primarily in C++, and since VS 2003, I've never seen it work reliably in any program with more than 1,000 lines of code. In larger code basses it just gives up entirely, forever updating and never assisting. I disable it and use Visual Assist when I can.
...they're interested in gross profit. The problem with PC games is you have a shorter window in which to make a profit before piracy takes hold. If you don't believe that initial sales will be high enough, you either don't release a PC version or you delay it. It's about risk management. There is still a market for PG games, the games you see being released are the games that are expected to have strong initial sales (or that have some other mechanism to thwart piracy (be it DRM, online accounts or what have you)).
I'd say: "If they have nothing to hide, they have nothing to fear".
Tell that to the Jews pre-Nazi Germany. Even innocent looking information, in the hands of the wrong person, can be used for harm. It's not hard to imagine how it may be used against undercover cops.
It was so awesome it pegged a whole core on my E8400. I expect to web to fuel larger hard drives, but faster CPUs? That's gettinga little out of hand.
I've summarized the technical reasons given by the three videos.
Executive Summary:
Seems like their peer-to-peer architecture exasperated otherwise common matchmaking and NAT transversal problems that should be expected and thoroughly tested when developing networked games.
Video 1:
Video 2:
Video 3:
After about 13 minutes of sitting in the stall, the police officer observed Craig lingering outside and frequently peeking through the crack of the door on the stall.
No doubt wondering WTF was taking the officer so long...
At 1216 hours, Craig tapped his right foot. I recognized this as a signal used by persons wishing to engage in lewd conduct. Craig tapped his toes several times and moves his foot closer to my foot.
More like a signal that he was out of toilet paper (which explains why he was "lingering outside" prior to the foot tapping).
A lot of us here on
How has the current economic landscape affected your employer?
It might actually provide some useful insight. #6 applies to me.
I'm using my 1984 Atari Touch Tablet you insensitive clod; one 535 x 383 resolution picture per page is a lot to ask for.
The first question that came to my mind after reading the article was are these laser generated random numbers suitable for cryptography? The article just states that random numbers are "vital" to cryptography, not that this method generates cryptographic grade random numbers. Certainly the brief explanation on how it works leaves a lot of room for question.
BTW, CryptMT is a simple stream cipher based on the Mersenne Twister. Sadly, the last time I looked at it it lacked any solid proofs. Nonetheless, Mersenne Twister is an excellent pseudorandom number generator.
The one day you'd sell your soul for something, souls are a glut.