The restrictions say:

Note: "any" not "all".
Now, IANAL, but I think your fears may come true.

Consider the time axis, from minus infinity to plus infinity.
Somewhere along this axis the universe comes into existence.
Call this point t0.

Now why is t0 exactly t0? Shouldn't there be another universe, exactly equal to this one, with time t1 (!= t0).

Now even if time is created as part of a "big bang", there should be a "meta-time" for which this holds.

You might want to read this:
http://www.theguardian.com/sci...

It's also time they address the infamous one-click buying button, which is basically the same thing.

But let's say you had a patent on something which earned you a couple of thousand dollars a month.
Would you then still think the same?

(Just playing devil's advocate here.)

Yes, but look where that age took us!

What have semiconductors been bringing us lately, besides the newest social apps and web-enabled office-collaboration bloatware?

Next headline: Is Betteridge's law always correct?

The argument may still be valid in a Vulcan court, though.

They are forcing ISPs to uphold their end of their deal with the customer, which is the good part.
However, the ISPs will probably improve service speed for _only_ Youtube as a result.
This creates a barrier to other video services.

This is all nice and all (transferring some data from A to B without stuttering), but what about my flying car?

If you can accomplish a task faster with a 3d-mouse than with a conventional mouse, and with less irritation, then why not?

http://xkcd.com/651/

You can already do that using anesthetics.

http://xkcd.com/538/