If the hate is within the rights of your freedom of speech - sure I would.

And sure, run naked too. I won't and I guess most won't but I wouldn't care personally if people did. That's their problem. :)

Which was - Nothing Useful / Being an ass! :)

To do some work for you I find http://dictionary.reference.co... which supports your idea of the word. But it does support both our versions very well.
So it's still correct to say "create a copy". And people use the word that way.

You say academia doesn't use it that way, the rest of the world does.

Yup. The problem is that you're the horse and you don't drink. :)
You haven't shown me any water yet.

Maybe you are right but you have yet to support it. So far you've been proven wrong.
At the same time I can agree this is getting tiresome.

No. Creative is a noun decribing people that do creative (adjective) work. And people that do creative are people that create unique stuff.
I've supported some kind of proof (I do in this case call the Oxford Dictionary proof) and so far you have not.

So what supports you?

Ah - Doh on the Synonyms part. Just saw you linked to the definition of synonym itself.
But also says it "was" a synonym for it, not that it is.

In a factory I suppose it's more likely say you assemble something. But at the same time you did create another copy.

It seems you mistake "creative" and "create". You don't have to be creative to create something.
Yes I agree "creative" implies inventing something "unique". Create doesn't.

So you're not creative if you copy something but you do create a copy.

Don't find support for "The East" and "The Soviet Empire" to be synonyms. But you say they are listed as such so I'll just believe that.

However the factory workers create the individual copies. The definition of "Creator" doesn't imply uniqueness either.

But if you want create to be "creating the design" I can agree. Then I create my own copy from your design.
Still not stealing though. :)

No it doesn't and create and make are synonyms.

http://www.oxforddictionaries....

And you Create a Copy.
There is not really a problem there.

Either I create something that didn't exist or I took something that did exist. And I certainly didn't take it so then it was created.

But prove me wrong if you feel like it. Or not if you don't.
I just find the definition odd.

You have odd definitions. Something that wasn't there before was created to look exactly like something else.
Still created. :)

sorry.. I really can't resist.
We present to you.. Clive Alive!

http://youtu.be/lydNxM5KV8M

English with Gothenburg accent. :)

So are probably the things I've said to them. Not sure they want to take that fight anyway. ;)

The measure is also having fun. Didn't say things were perfect before because they weren't. But I do think it got even worse removing choices.
You still notice difference if you gem incorrectly, should we remove that too?

And you can still complain and have fun. ;)

Tried WoW under Linux earlier this year and "it works" but far from as it should. Full gfx-settings under Windows and no problems with current 25 man raids. Under Linux it tries to kill itself with lowest settings.

Seems like you got some of the problems at least.

I didn't like the idea of LFR to begin with but I guess there is a point to it. However what we get now from Blizzard is four levels of the same RAID, from LFR to Heroic and no new instances at all since release. They got a few scenarios though but I honestly hate them and they're not the old five mans in any way.

And daily grinds are indeed crap. I hate dailies and then they make them mandatory over time. At least they make them too important. I'd love to have normal quests I can run around and finish off instead. I can't pretend dailies are real content. It's all just Blizzard being lazy, just as with not creating five man dungeons.

And talents as I wrote in a reply to one of your replies. I can't really feel they make a difference at the moment. Also being lazy I suppose.

Blizzard got too lazy.