You know, I understand that knowing the distinction between 'who' and 'whom' has fallen out of vogue, so I'm okay with people just sticking with 'who' for all cases. But I gotta tell you, if you're gonna use 'whom', you'd better be using it properly unless you're aiming for "ironically smug".

'Whom' is only used when the person is the object of the phrase; if it's the subject, it's 'who'. Just remember the form "who [verb]ed whom".

Does anyone else think that it looks and moves exactly like a headcrab?

"Patent for a door with a mechanical handle that may be opened via gestures performed on the handle. The door is opened if contact with the handle corresponds to a predefined gesture for opening the door."

I feel like they'd have more of a case if the upcoming Elder Scrolls game wasn't marketed as "SKYRIM" in giant caps, with a barely-noticeable "The Elder Scrolls V" above it.

I personally think it's more interesting that somebody was offered $60,000 for it and they declined.

Well, completely ignoring any effect the scene has on Han's character development, I think most people get outraged because it doesn't make sense that Jabba would send a bounty hunter that can't shoot someone sitting across the table from him. Because it makes so little sense on its own, the only purpose it serves is to change Han's character from the original. Frankly, I'm not sure that Han would have survived so long if he waited until getting shot at before shooting. So it's really the inanity of the change that I think people take issue with.

XP was released 10 years ago and people upgrade their computers much more frequently than they buy new cars.

If it was a model of car that was 30 years old and someone found a serious safety problem, the unanimous verdict would be to buy a new, modern car.