Comment Re:Edward Snowden: For exposing the NSA (Score 1) 299
Bingo. I'd love for Anita to debate someone with even half a brain, and be exposed as merely a mouthpiece for a white, cishet man.
Bingo. I'd love for Anita to debate someone with even half a brain, and be exposed as merely a mouthpiece for a white, cishet man.
Not a hard pick for me, given that Sarkeesian is (i) a fraud who has no interest in gaming for its own sake, (ii) a serial plagiarist, and (iii) simply in it for the money.
Just like you say -- the electrons were in a storage vessel, left over from another experiment. Except, the vessel was probably a storage ring -- kind of like a particle accelerator, but without the stuff to boost particles to higher speeds.
Terrorism: n
the use of violence and intimidation, intended to cause fear, in the pursuit of political aims. Note the lack of any definition of targets.
Not terrorism: n
Just about every fucking thing that's reported as such by the US media.
The word is misused as much as "literally" these days. So much so that I can't even.
Thanks! Done and done.
Now I can change my gmail "display name" to be something other than my stupid, mandated Google+ name!
The real question, here, is whether or not I'll be able to decouple my gmail from the unused google+ profile that I had to create. I hate that I cannot have my real name on my email without having it spread all over the internet simultaneously.
Fuck me, that's impressive! It even manages to track 17 million ghosts!
...none of its examples are in anyway WTF. I can't believe nobody has mentioned Fortran's arithmetic IF yet...
Video shader in Fortran? Check, done that.
...said one huge helping of butthurt.
"Views on the ethics of infidelity. Which she maintained is inherently wrong even if the person who was cheated on never finds out, because (aside from willfully endangering their partner by way of increased STD risk) if the unfaithful party then has sex with their partner, they are doing so under false pretenses, and therefore without their partner’s consent. That is, sex with a partner who doesn’t know you’ve cheated on them is sex without consent."
Zoe has, by her own confession, committed rape. In the SJW handbook, that's doubleplusungood. Hence the strong reaction from the community.
Stop moving the goalposts. The accusations by here boyfriend are here:
http://thezoepost.wordpress.co...
Tell me, which one of these accusations is false?
Jesus, you really are a shameless wankstain, aren't you?
The only possible interpretation of any research whatever in the `social sciences' is: some do, some don't. -- Ernest Rutherford
