Certainly nobody helped me cheat on the test-- it took me two tries! Perhaps the guy that so sure there's nothing but cheating going on is not as smart in electronics and amateur radio rules & regs as my wife, the social worker and the most non-technical person I know, licensed for about 15 years now. Or the 8-year-old girl in Florida that got her license this year: http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=6+year+old+ham+radio+operator&source=web&cd=9&ved=0CGEQtwIwCA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DyYkzO0wpBfE&ei=mfLLTv3aJoWy2QXoou2lDw&usg=AFQjCNH9TukBu7y5pi9fkHJJgtnBV1iMYg

Examples of very young hams abound. Documented cases of VEs (volunteer examiners) helping examinees cheat are few, and in comparison, nearly nonexistent.

Say, what is this lysdexia thing I keep reading about?

Ya. WordPerfect Office 12 is the standard around here for our roughly 200 employees that use PCs. The other 1000 are on vehicles most of the time and don't use any software.

Then we have a few people that interact a great deal more with other companies, local government and etc. For them we have to buy license of Microsoft Word, because abovementioned external parties continue to mindlessly send us stuff in Word format, often @#%$@#%&^%$#*& .DOCX format, and the users aren't happy with Word Viewer, Catdoc, or other tools. Worse, many have to send docs to other agencies who insist on a proprietary format from a monolithic single-source vendor.

WordPerfect mostly works ok and about 30% of my users don't realize they aren't using Bill's program. It has a few issues. There's a piece of code that sits in memory after you print until you're done until you exit WP. After printing the second doc with complicated images and layout, that piece tends to lockup and take 100% of the cpu. It never finishes what it was doing. So we just kill that piece, don't even exit WP, and life goeth on.

I love "reveal codes." Why don't all wordprocs have that? Untangles some really twisty little problems, especially when my users import docs from another source, edit it, and the result is a tangled mess.

You want to know the funniest part of this? As part of the support team for this, I have to assume when users call and say they are having a problem with "Word" that they mean "WordPerfect:" because that's what they all call it.

On our network, which is located In The Real World, users bring in rogue access points from home, horribly infected laptops (again, from home) and even IP phones. They try to plug in devices with DHCP servers built into them. Any solution that automatically adds a machine, without one of us "propeller heads" reviewing it, is likely to (and actually has) disable whole buildings full of users. Angry users. I'm talking about stuff that can happen, but also about the stuff that has already happened in our less vigilant days. Some sort of autodiscovery would be fine, if it put newly discovered objects into a "hey I found this" list that we'd have to manually move to a "access allowed" group of some kind as appropriate for that object's location and purpose.

Yes! FWBuilder is all we use for the enterprise. We have basic servers with multiple NICs (three on the edge firewalls- inside, outside, and DMZ) all managed by FWBuilder. Access to the one machine running FWBuilder is controlled carefully. That's all we need.

Sure it's unique. But the FCC database is public information, and I don't always want my street address associated with an email ID or etc. Not where it can be so freely mined. And some ISP's still insist we add characters to our federally issued, guaranteed unique callsigns. I don't use ISP and mail providers like that (stupid) anymore.

What kind of connectivity? My crystal ball being a little cloudy at the moment, I'd say PVC PIPE! Then you can put anything in it you want, any time.

Actually, hams sometimes use 75 ohm coax when all the equipment is designed for 50 ohm-- that represents a 1.5:1 mismatch, which is tolerable if you don't mind some loss. But the really bad thing about using 10Base2 for ethernet is the wiring restrictions- you can only put so many stations (devices) on one length of cable, and you have to have a BNC Tee connection for every one, and you have to have 50-ohm termination plugs at both ends, and an issue with ANY station on the cable will probably disable all of them- 10Base2 is bus-wired. I used to maintain a coax network, and it was trouble about 6 times a month at first. Things improved once I get the dicey connections replaced, but it never got better than about 2 or 3 failures a month.

The right tools for the right job: Get a 110-punchdown tool (or one with 66 and 110 blades) for $60-70. Don't bother with the stupid plastic ones that come with the cat5 wall jacks-- you need one that's spring loaded and sets the wires with a nice solid THUNK. You can get the wall plates and inserts from any big box store now, and Radio Shock (sic) and some hardware stores. Screw terminals- gaa. You want me to strip and fan out 8 wires (no cheating by just doing the blue, and green pairs) and then mess around with a little screw driver? No thanks. I can terminate about 5 to 7 of them per hour, including the occasional re-do, with a punch tool. 'Sides, if you want to work the best, you have to maintain the twist right up to the terminals. Try that with screws. I run gigabit over my home-terminated jacks and home-made jumpers all the time, and I don't have any errors or retries at my switch ports.

What he said! Besides the coax was probably for TV antenna or cable TV and as such is 75 ohm impedance. That's no fracking good for 10Base2 (ethernet over coax) and it might not work with some types of balun (coax to twisted pair widgets). Use the coax to drag in a pull-string or a cat5e run. That's the best use for it. Unless you need to equip locations for OTR or cable TV.

Indeed, one can purchase a few vital components (boards) and create a SDR (software defined radio) and from there, you write your own radio, as in code. Here's one http://www.linuxdevices.com/news/NS3911104852.html for US $85k. Too much? Try this: http://www.flex-radio.com/ where you'll find lots of options.

SMART is SMART, platform independent. Your OS's way of sending SMART commands to the drive and getting the results back may vary; the venerable smartctl on the command line is the one I'm most familiar with.

In PC's, some of the BIOSs have an option to enable SMART. Most of them simply send the "-a on" command to enable the drives SMART processes. Many also do a "-H" for a basic health check of the drive, and squawk at you during the post if it fails. I'm wondering if the mac does something very similar. If so, a delay of about a second or maybe less is about right.

Use of smartctl -h /dev/sda is a good measure of how the drive is, but it's very basic. Then again, it sure beats a poke in the eye with a sharp SIMM. Or a drive that dies without any warning.