not amenable to analysis using classical methods.
Care to explain how this is true? I think I have an idea, but using "a healthy combination of certain areas of comp-sci (databases, machine learning, NLP, AI), statistical methods, and, quite often, improvisation" seems to be an even more obtuse approach than going about it the old-fashioned way. I'd much rather hear that people are using what we already know or (still better, but probably not as plausible) the latest mathematical advances regarding nonlinear systems rather than just ad-hoc'ing methods because... computers! I believe that this is at least partiallly Nassim Taleb's objection to the entire field of data science as well. How many 'results' coming from data science are the product of sound and rigorous methodologies, and how many are just due to chance/data dredging?
Otherwise, I have seen plenty of rich people who were also pretty bad with money.
Namely Donald Trump. Who is revered by American society for... absolutely no good reason whatsoever.
Once you know someone is a liberal Subaru driving lesbian with a soft spot for abused animals, a keen interest in Sara Maclaughlin and a $1500.00 a year wardrobe budget where is there to go for the next 50 years with this person ?
Hey mate, that's 75k in revenue. Time to get on 1500dollarwardrobe.com. Did I mention that we plan to have deliveries made personally by Sara McLachlan for an extra $3000 fee?
The hardest part of climbing the ladder of success is getting through the crowd at the bottom.