Comment Re:Can't wait till google makes it way onto that t (Score 0) 168
national*
national*
pretty much every cable ISP in the United States I can think of does this, as well.
why would Google make it onto the test when EPB doesn't? this obviously has naught to do with "fastest ISPs," whatever that would even mean. really they mean residential "broadband" access speeds over international common carriers.
sadly, they would probably include Google among this list just for political reasons.
How about having NO ONE control them?
.. law
are you.. retarded?
not posting as "AC" because no one cares--myself included. you could be right. or perhaps Rogers just really wishes they hadn't the misfortune of being born in an utter shit-hole.
why wouldn't it? holy crap. the sensationalism in that title.. the obvious political slant coloured with righteous indignation. it makes me feel en garde, as if I'm being trolled, and sometimes I may be, but really I'm not, because it seems most people actually think the way the headline implies. people want the government to take control of everything. 10 trillion new laws a month, or get out of Washington. you're not doing your job!
holy god, man. it's like I like in bizarro-land. it really, truly is. is everyone insane?
the bit I love is people not knowing what the hell they're talking about.
I'd wager that people keen on using the "word" statist are probably 'anarcho-capitalist' libertarians. they aren't constitutionalists. you're really confused.
more importantly, the word state does not mean what you think it does in this context. "states rights" in the United States refers to a particular form of federated government, which has been instituted and is guaranteed by a living constitution. the word statist refers to a tendency to favor an elite class of governing rulers. it has nothing to do with constitutional republics. further, those who defend states' rights do so not out of some fascination with state governments, but with respect for the document upon which this nation was made significant. you have to take these things in context, or you're just being ignorant.
further still, you misunderstand what states' rights is and how it applies. it has nothing to do with giving the government power. in fact, it has a lot more to do with reducing government powers, by marginalizing their scope. it is a process, not an end.
I didn't do anything for you. read it if you want to? it has no "scientific" value, because it's not science. I don't need to read something like that. I don't read Harry Potter, either.
in the US, the conservative politica party is called the Libertarians. republicans aren't opposed to big government nonsense at all. you're confused. but, yes, of course true conservatives don't want to politicize the environment and take taxpayer money by theft to spend on their pet projects, under the guise of "progress."
The change is so drastic, the paper says, that scientists can claim with near certainty that events like the Texas heat wave last year, the Russian heat wave of 2010 and the European heat wave of 2003 would not have happened without the planetary warming caused by the human release of greenhouse gases.
yeah, ok. thanks for isolating those 1.0 * 10^23 variables for me and forming a conveniently packaged political conclusion. what's next? this kind of "science" is a joke.
Obama appeals to real people? uh, sure. he's incredibly appealing with the way he wants to increase taxes and the size of government, while shitting all over our civil liberties, assassinating American citizens, and continuing wars--traditional and ideological both.
Romney has tons more cash than Obama? hah. you are so uninformed and deluded that I don't even know where to begin. Obama has $80 billion for his presidential campaign, and that number alone ought to tell you idiots who are so adamant about meaningless sound-bytes like "campaign finance reforrm" that the whole political/electoral system is nothing more than a rigged game, a facade for crony capitalists to keep funneling money to their corporate buddies. how much more obvious do you need it? you wouldn't see such insane figures in the first place if that weren't the case. this entire regulatory environment, this welfare system--it's nothing more than theft from taxpayers for the benefit of rich banksters and scumbags, which, newsflash, is comprised of Obama and Romney both.
It's a naive, domestic operating system without any breeding, but I think you'll be amused by its presumption.