Obama appeals to real people? uh, sure. he's incredibly appealing with the way he wants to increase taxes and the size of government, while shitting all over our civil liberties, assassinating American citizens, and continuing wars--traditional and ideological both.

Romney has tons more cash than Obama? hah. you are so uninformed and deluded that I don't even know where to begin. Obama has $80 billion for his presidential campaign, and that number alone ought to tell you idiots who are so adamant about meaningless sound-bytes like "campaign finance reforrm" that the whole political/electoral system is nothing more than a rigged game, a facade for crony capitalists to keep funneling money to their corporate buddies. how much more obvious do you need it? you wouldn't see such insane figures in the first place if that weren't the case. this entire regulatory environment, this welfare system--it's nothing more than theft from taxpayers for the benefit of rich banksters and scumbags, which, newsflash, is comprised of Obama and Romney both.

next?

you don't know what you're talking about. when you give something free reign, you are giving that thing rule over some other thing.

reins are straps attached to horses. you can "rein in" a thing, but you don't give people "rein" over anything.

uh, the first two people you list are string theorists (lol.) so is the third, but he's also a complete charlatan and quack.

give me a fucking break.

in the video, with its predictable post-rock sounding uplifting score (I called it before even clicking the link), Neil Tyson asks of me: how much would [I] pay to "launch our economy?"

um, I'm sorry, pal, but I don't think that's how "the economy" works.

With Kansas stating that 'evolution could not rule out a supernatural or theistic source, that evolution itself was not fact but only a theory and one in crisis, and that Intelligent Design must be considered a viable alternative to evolution,' and North Carolina's legislature circulating a bill telling people to ignore climate science, maybe it's time we start listening to experts who have a proven record of success, rather than ideology that has only been 'proven' in the mind of elected politicians.

or maybe it's time to get the government out of education?

lol.

um.. yea? I'm not a self-loathing guilt ridden "progressive" piece of shit.

There's a very easy rebuttal to the Libertarian argument that government employees' personal lives shouldn't be regulated at least a little

yeah? I have a really easy rebuttal to your "rebuttal:" FUCK YOU.

Wouldn't you want the same policies applied to politicians to prevent them from developing relationships with that one nice guy who just so happens to be a lobbyist for a major kitten-puppy-bunny murder conglomerate?

no. stay the FUCK out of my life.

Not only would his veto have done nothing, it would have also opened the door to attack ads about how he vetoed healthcare for wounded veterans, since that's also in the bill.

um, ok? the absurdity of this is just mind-boggling. so what you're suggesting is you support someone being in power for no other reason than their desire to be in power, while they do things antithetical to the health of the nation? please, cry me a river because your re-election campaign is ruined.

I'm sure you'll do an about face during your second term, right? why would I ever doubt you, dear leader?

you people are absolutely fucking perverted. you are nothing but an indoctrinated, state-worshipping lemming. I'm not even kidding. do some introspection and save yourself from this mind-numbing filth. you are actually coming out and saying that The President of the United States America has no obligation to do anything to better the circumstances of the nation he is representing, so long as whatever he may do is in discord with his ability to retain office.

I'm pretty sure that "falling on his sword to keep you happy," whatever that even means, is exactly what he should do. I think you have it backward. I don't give a fuck about being kept happy--that's your bag, because all this is to you is a popularity contest. it's partisan nonsense, and has no relevance to logic or truth. he should fall on his sword because he's damn near treasonous, shitting on the United States Constitution without abandon. I won't mind if you go down with him; it will happen eventually. it always does.