He just kept talking in one long incredibly unbroken sentence moving from topic to topic so that no one had a chance to interrupt
it was really quite hypnotic

Encryption only fixes third-party snooping/throttling.
Malicious peers can use encryption too :)

Try not taking things so personally. I bet you're one of those people who, when asked to conserve energy, angrily turns off every single light in their house and pouts about how awful and stupid it is.

PS: I got rid of my car last year and it's been great

The amount of algae growth required for powering America's fleet of vehicles would cover every ocean and kill every single fish on the planet.

Land-based farms require pumping water, maintenance, energy, etc. If you build them in the desert, you suffer horrendous water losses. If you build them near the ocean, you encroach on livable and arable land.

The price of gas is never going to be reasonable again. Maybe a few dips here and there, but nothing long-term and certainly nothing permanent. Don't bank on some miracle technology to bail you out -- this is a fundamental thermodynamics issue.

Go look up "peak oil"

Maybe the solution is to reduce the number of cars instead of trying to figure out a way to power them (in an unsustainable manner)

Get XLink Kai, problem solved!
Supports original Xbox, Xbox 360, PS2, PS3, PSP, and Gamecube.

It's free to use, and the source code is freely available:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XLink_Kai

[citation needed]

you are completely wrong, by the way

You fail at logic.

If it takes you that long to break WEP, you're doing it wrong. Replay some packets to generate traffic and your IVs will reach ~20,000 within a couple of minutes. Then, the key cracking itself takes maybe 40 seconds.

All eggs are edible, you insensitive clod!

Probably because you're intellectually lazy and don't bother looking for other environmental groups or doing some basic research about environmental issues. I guess the problem is that you absorb whatever "knowledge" is placed in front of you, without regard to its legitimacy or source.

An amorphous blob consisting of people who know basic physics, physics experts, knowledge gleaned from experiments, and people who observe things beyond the confines of this planet say you're absolutely wrong about everything you discuss on that "nasty little truths" page.

No ad-hominem here. Happy now?
Also, why do you need to know who he is or what he has done in order to defend your claim? It doesn't matter whether a world-renowned physicist or a schoolchild proves you wrong, as long as the rebuttal is based on facts.