If this is typical of stuff used throughout... then open sourcing would be very difficult, you'd have to separate everything like that.
That's largely irrelevant, though - it's the game code we need open sourcing and in particular the server code. As long as the game *data* (i.e. the sounds etc.) is generally available we can still use it even if it doesn't get GPLed or whatever.
No, not electrical storage density but physical density. As in mass / volume.
We're talking about replacing the Tesla car's battery with some number of these to increase it's range. Whereas we know you could install three for the same weight we don't know that three will fit inside the Tesla battery compartment.
so... what was the site license I used for years and years when I worked at a university?
Fair enough, I'd forgotten about that - that's the MSDN Academic Alliance programme. It's a special case, there's no equivalent in the commercial world. I don't think it's supposed to be unaudited though.
If you're an OEM reseller and you had a site-licence then you'd just be installing Windows on PCs and sending them out of the door. If you buy individual OEM licences then you can sell on CDs, activation keys and the basic licence / warranty docs.
If you want to put yourself on the map, publish your own map.
