Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:This will not end well (Score 1) 120

Comment Re:Inadvertent Or Not ... (Score 2, Insightful) 267

The law considers postcards to be covered by the telecommunications privacy regulations.

So Google action's here are similar to looking at the receiver and sender addresses, and the postage stamp on the postcard, and reading a few words of the card in the process. Don't tell me that postal workers won't inadvertently catch a word or two of someone's postcard when reading the public information of the addresses?

Comment Re:Horribly misleading (Score 1) 351

There is already a similar system in place in Australia, which has been running for at least a decade. It is used to monitor truck speeds over large distances - cameras mounted on highway overpasses snap trucks' number plates as they pass, and calculate the speed between cities. This makes the CB radio reporting of radar traps less useful, and log book falsification difficult. Don't know whether it uses satellites, and really, who cares if it does?

Slashdot Top Deals

If you want to put yourself on the map, publish your own map.

Working...