Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Hardware solution (Score 1) 669

Yep, second the ReadyNas. I bought a diskless Duo (available here in Japan), and threw two 1TB WD Greenpower drives (quiet and power-saving; though spin-down isn't supported yet due to some bug apparently attributed to Western Digital). If this one starts to fill up, I'll go for the NV+ in a heartbeat.

Generally, I keep all my archived files in a folder on the NAS (it's set up with Infrant's RAID-X, which is roughly equivalent to RAID-5 with expandability), which provides me with a decent level of redundancy. My main machine is backed up on a separate external drive. Honestly, my files aren't important enough to pay for some offsite storage, but keeping the archived files bundled with my active files ensures their integrity and allows me to access them whenever.

Comment Re:well (Score 1) 105

I'm guessing this will only be useful for certain types of users. There are two real theft goals: either the thief is after the computer or after the data. I don't have the numbers, but I suspect the thief is after the computer (to sell on eBay, etc.) 95%+ of the time. Assuming this does actually make the computer inoperable, the thief will simply throw it out when it stops working (you won't get your computer/data back, and he doesn't care what was on the disk). If the thief needed to retrieve data from a laptop, the first thing an intelligent thief (say, a competitor company) would do is take out the hard disk without turning the stolen machine on and put it in a separate machine. This kind of defeats the purpose of a remote lockdown, because as far as I can tell, it requires that the notebook must be powered on. It may or may not be encrypted, but most people don't use full-disk encryption, so they get what they're after. So, this might offer a slightly higher degree of security against the first type of criminal, who is primarily after the laptop, but not the second, who is after the data (which is presumably much more valuable).

Intel Open Sources Graphics Drivers 345

PeterBrett writes "Intel's Keith Packard announced earlier today that Intel was open sourcing graphics drivers for their new 965 Express Chipset family graphics controllers. From the announcement: 'Designed to support advanced rendering features in modern graphics APIs, this chipset family includes support for programmable vertex, geometry, and fragment shaders. By open sourcing the drivers for this new technology, Intel enables the open source community to experiment, develop, and contribute to the continuing advancement of open source 3D graphics.' The new drivers, available from the Linux Graphics Drivers from Intel website, are licensed under the GPL for Linux kernel drivers, and MIT license for XOrg 2D & 3D rendering subsystems."

Hoboken, NJ vs. Giant Parking Robot 379

markwalling writes "Wired News is running a story about Hoboken, New Jersey's battles with robotic parking. A legal battle over the license had shut down the garage, essentially trapping hundreds of cars inside. Bill Coats has recommended that the parking garage be run off open source software: 'Vendees are going to become more sophisticated in the deals they enter into.' Coats even sees this as a driver of open source software. 'If you can get (open source software) you can't be shut down.' But that's harder to do in highly custom applications."

Sony May Try To Stop PS3 Game Resales 423

Next Generation reports on Sony's hopes that it will be able to prevent the resale of PS3 games. The article argues that it is unlikely they'll succeed in this goal. From the article: "One expert in retail law told Next-Gen.Biz, 'Sony can theoretically sell a license to play the game, but the user would have to acknowledge acceptance of the license. You've seen this when you install software on a PC. I'm not sure that the license agreement is enforceable if the licensee doesn't agree to it. Also, even if the agreement is enforceable, it's hard to preclude subsequent sale of the disc. The consumer could theoretically agree that he doesn't own the right to transfer his license, but why couldn't he sell the medium that held the license (the disc)? Sony can't enforce the agreement against a third party, as it lacks privity with the third party.'"

Slashdot Top Deals

With your bare hands?!?

Working...