Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Space for love? Sure. (Score 3, Interesting) 186

Thank you.

People that look back historically always seem to look at people back then as if they are children. Even when they are full grown adults. Its not like we are more capable then they were. Its not like they are somehow stupid. Like on TV cave men always simply grunt, when their vocal capabilities are vast. No other animal with vocal capabilities simply ignores them. Its un-scientifit. They couldn't develop without use.

So this crack about if there is "space for love?" Come on! He says that as if Love is useless. Again, unscientific.

Comment Re:Duh. (Score 1) 1601

I am not speaking of the success of the campaign but the organization and leadership of its leaders. Maybe instead of "running a campaign" I should have said "managing a campaign."

And yes, I think if you can't manage a campaign, you are not helping people believe you can manage the White House.

Comment Re:Duh. (Score 1) 1601

I agree with you. However, since I am a Liberal, I tried to be understanding of the Conservative network Fox. I try not to judge because if Conservatives like it, it couldn't be as transparent as I think it is. But I see it as you described it...

Comment Re:Duh. (Score 5, Interesting) 1601

I disagree with the NPR crack. I do agree that in the circle of my conservative friends, cracking on NPR as liberal is a common theme. But I listen to NPR and they work very hard to be non-biased. You rarely detect it in their stories or how they conduct their interviews. Sometimes you do though like Terry Gross blunder of an interview with Mrs. Cheney.

I, however, am a Liberal. I fully recognize the MSNBC bias and admit it as much as I recognize the Fox bias. Both networks have some good shows, and some clowns. Just because I am liberal does not mean I don't see a biased show for what it is. I wonder though if conservatives can tell the same.

I used to think McCain would make a good president but not anymore. He ran a bad campaign. If you cant run a campaign and drive your people, your not looking good to be running the executive. McCain of 2000/2004 would have made a good president. McCain before he sold his soul to the Bush team.

Comment Re:WPA2 is NOT broken (Score 1) 311

It stands to reason that ethernet will always be much much faster than wireless.

My wireless is not wide open, but I consider it insecure. Its firewalled off so the only thing accessible is the internet. I do allow ssh into my local network, and I also have a music server accessible over wireless. Just until I run the CAT5 to my stereo.

Comment Re:Best Post Ever. (Score 4, Informative) 1912

I was told she was not his first choice. He had the final say, but it was his people that pushed her forward.

I agree with your take on McCain. After Bush won the 2nd term, McCain decided the only way to become president was to quit being such a maverick. Thats when he started supporting all the Bush initiatives. Thats when he lost his "base."

The real McCain would have been strong with independents. However, I am not sure he could have won the nomination without selling out to Bush.

McCain made his choice. Kicked his independent support to the curb to try and get ultra conservative supporters that never liked him.

Slashdot Top Deals

"I've seen it. It's rubbish." -- Marvin the Paranoid Android

Working...