Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Why this is hard for me to believe (Score 1) 569

Did you even read your comment?

Practically all PCs sell with windows installed. This does not raise the price of a PC very much. So why risk the lawsuits from the BSA, why fight with all the DRM.

Putting a new version of windows on an old PC does not usually make sense from a technological perspective. Windows just keeps getting more bloated, and resource intensive.

You pirate old versions of Windows, if you're going to pirate Windows at all! Maybe you get an old PC without the install disks because you don't need a powerhouse machine. There's no way to get Win98 through Microsoft. You've got to get it second hand or pirated.

Comment Re:Apple is the new Microsoft (Score 2, Insightful) 143

>>>In other words, Apple is the new Microsoft

No. Apple is just like any other business that seeks to hold onto a monopoly. MS, Comcast, Cox, OPEC... they all act alike because they all share the same fundamental fear of loss. They don't want to lose the market, or the money that comes with it. It's basic human instinct made manifest at the mega-corporate level.

And how does that equate to "No?" What you described is the behavior MS engaged in and have been condemned for.

Comment Re:Safety is bad (Score 1) 601

If it was inevitable that I would die if I drove a car, I would chose not to drive. I would find another way to get where I needed to be and/or change my life in such a way that I didn't need to be there. That would increase my safety as well as the safety of the devil-may-cares who insist on driving. As the risks of driving go down, I would be more inclined to actually drive and assume additional risks while driving.

Comment Re:Safety is bad (Score 1) 601

I agree that complacency would start to slip in over time. It would be held in check, however, by the relative frequency of drivers paying for their lack of care by suffering impalement. In other words, there is a risk/reward payoff we all calculate at some level and I think with less safe cars, people will, on average, decide to be somewhat safer in their driving habits. They may not sustain that initial level of vigilance all the time, but they will maintain a higher level of vigilance than they would in a non-spear-equiped car.

Comment Re:Safety is bad (Score 2, Interesting) 601

You laugh, but this same point was made in the excellent book, The Armchair Economist by Steven Landsburg. In the first chapter, The Power of Incentives: How Seat Belts Kill, he questions whether the additional safety equipment really translates into an overall improvement in safety and demonstrates part of his argument by having us imagine driving a car w/o seat belts and with a sharp metal spike protruding from the steering wheel aimed at your chest. It's hard to deny you would drive very, very carefully in that situation. Safety equipment gives the driver increased confidence to take higher risks. I have a friend who says he considers seatbelts a performance option. I suspect a lot of drivers think the same (subconsciously).

Slashdot Top Deals

There are two ways to write error-free programs; only the third one works.

Working...