I'm aware. The point was that they are clearly related through the male line. The generations could be off by a bit of course like in your uncle's case, but that's not what you initially suggested Re the 'Re:Are they really related' above.

With only 4 differences in the Y chromosome, I'd suggest that if the women did stray it was with an in-law.

Ah, but it will also lead to polygamy, so those people won't have to divorce their heterosexual spouses. They can just bring the sheep and hedgehogs into the existing marriage.

Or maybe, just a wild thought here, maybe they have a slightly better insight into her symptoms, having actually examined her and seen her test results, and they have already ruled that out for reasons which your cursory diagnosis, based on reading an ABCnews article and several minutes of medical training, missed.

Of course below the comment you link to is a link to the photo which it turns out is not 500 pixels wide, a number apparently spontaneously generated between someones buttocks.

We get souls? I missed the part where that was proven. Actually first you have to define what a soul is before you try arguing if and when we get issued one. And how does the moment of soul gifting alone define the issue? I think what you mean is if you want to oversimplify to make your own argument you can. Which means you don't disagree with TFA at all.

So... you say the US has more commitment than the UN to free speech, because the UN let someone give a speech, um, freely?

Of course .

Clearly you have never offered to buy one a drink.

So... Google provides only an excerpt but Turnitin gives the whole work? That would be a significant difference. How else does the teacher get their hands on the evidence? The real important difference is Google is doing this with books whose rights are controlled by major publishers and their lawyers, not students.

So if I offer to pay you $5000 to kill my wife and you do... am I responsible or are you? There could be money in it if you get the answer right.

That's odd, because to me the modern music doesn't sound that different from what was playing in the late 90's, which is why I tend to think of it as crap. If it sounds like things I've already listened to it's not liable to make an impression on me. I'm kind of disappointed that there isn't something which has 'evolved' enough to make me want to shake my fist and tell those damn kids to turn their so-called music down.