Well it's a lazy journalistic crutch and needs to be mocked at every opportunity.

Came here to post this.

A pool. A list of gun owners. Same thing!

Not really see what they actually did was just literally publish the list, they didn't incite anyone to violence. I'm not entirely sure I agree with the release of the list to begin with, for other reasons.

An AC calling someone a pussy. You're doing god's trolling work son.

Having tested many, my current vote is for Evolution. Mostly because it can do RPC over HTTPs and talk to Exchange 2003 and later email servers. Which is kind of a big deal.

For some dumbass reason I thought it meant the Windows 8 store. I don't know maybe the people who wanted the game already bought it on those other platforms? It's too new/not enough install base?

Clearly M dollarsign is to blame. Clearly. Maybe people don't want to play a mobile game on a desktop. Maybe lots of things.

Making sensationalist so so brave statement bashing Microsoft will probably bring this person in more money. Maybe no one wanted to buy it based on its own merits? Why blame the platform? So weird.

I thought it was free as in speech, not free as in beer? It sounds like people want their special little thing to not get too popular and to not let people make money off of it. I don't see much wrong with what Red Hat/Fedora and Ubuntu do. What's wrong with charging money to support an enterprise level product? Is that what Stallman and Berens want?

Calm down I've already been told. I was wrong on the internet.

Well cool, it still hasn't been found to apply to slander/defamation/libel cases.

The first amendment has been interpreted by common and case law to not protect you in cases of slander or libel. If you're arguing for an entirely literal interpretation of the first amendment well then I'm not entirely sure what to tell you.

Congress didn't make the laws, the individual states did. Womp womp.

Correct, it has to both be false and malicious.