And in fact, for large classes of interesting applications, installer and installed size is overwhelmingly data, not code. Games are going to be 95%+ data (check out how small the actual app is sometimes; often less than 1% the size of the data files). Microsoft Office has far, far more space allocated to fonts, clip art, all those multilingual spelling dictionaries, and templates than the actual *.exe files.
And even the self-contained
Having behavior driven largely by data, not good is a good thing, of course. Data is a whole lot easier to debug than code, and bugs in data are generally much less catastrophic assuming the code itself does good validation.
This test was only using a single socket system. Perf differences from XP are going to be greater on a NUMA multisocket systems like Barcelona or Nehalem. XP predates NUMA on the PC architecture, while Vista and Win 7 got a lot of tuning for it.
This can be a big help for video encoding and other highly multithreaded tasks.
With a sample size of 16, "one third" ISN'T statistically different from 50/50.
On Windows, the most common one is DirectShow. (or whatever they've renamed it in Vista/Win7)
DirectShow is alive and well on Vista and Windows 7. There is a new media API called MediaFoundation, which is used by default in WMP for Win 7. It's quite different and improved in many ways over DirectShow, but can interoperate with existing DirectShow decoders.
The MPEG-LA license only protects you against the MPEG-LA members. In no way does it provide any sort of guarantee that someone who isn't in MPEG-LA won't start suing at any point in time. The argument against Theora in this regard can really be made against any codec.
Well, the members of the MPEG-LA patent pools hold pretty much all the known-critical patents for video compression, so that's actually a pretty good real-world protection.
I made a few samples using the latest versions of x264, VC-1, and Theora, testing both offline VBR and real-time CBR encoding.
http://cid-bee3c9ac9541c85b.skydrive.live.com/browse.aspx/.Public/Theora%5E_1.1
Theora is defintely improved, but I see a lot of basis pattern throughout these samples. Theora would be well-served by a postprocessing filter. Theora's 1-pass CBR encoding definitely needs a LOT of tuning before it'd be viable for real-world content; I don't think we'll see it used effectively for live encoding this version.
Coming from the digital video world, I'm entirely opposed to standardizing on using GB instead of GiB in any context. Because lots of other industries, like telecommunications and digital media, have long used the correct ^10 numbers. Come to think of it, Apple was the last company to use KB/sec for compression bitrates, and even they dropped it as of QuickTime 6 back in 2003.
When you get provisioned bandwith, you're getting ^10 numbers. And when you compress video, you're using ^10 values (so, 20 Mbps is really 20,000,000 bits per second, not 20,971,520)
It's a big pain to have to always convert between the real values and the erroneous ^2 values when figuring out how much video we can put on a disc/drive.
It will be a horrible thing to have GB mean different things in different contexts and to have to know when to do or not do the conversions.
You won't get a FormatLikeWord95 tag if you're not using Word 95, of course
It's important for lots of users that they can maintain functional compatibility and bidirectional conversion with older Office documents, so that was a core design goal of the
You may not need that yourself, but a lot of people do, and the new formats give them that in a much more interoperable, searchable, and efficient XML-with-.zip structure.
It seems like 90% of the compliants about the new formats don't even acknowledge the design goal, which makes any discussion of how good it is pretty irrelevant.
A clean-room new office file format would have had much worse interoperability and hence much less adoption, for only aesthetic gains at best.
If OpenOffice doesn't have Normal/Draft, it's dead to me. I don't want to see page breaks when I'm still writing the darn text! That's bugged me about other tools for getting on 20 years now.
That killed Pages 1.0 for me as well.
Well, yes, of course you'd use PDF if you want to get the exact fonts and layout on the other end.
But nor are you going to write an article in Acrobat. Note that the Office apps now have an excellent "Save as PDF" mode that's much faster than Distiller.
"The one charm of marriage is that it makes a life of deception a neccessity." - Oscar Wilde