Comment Re:The code gets larger, and yet things dissapear! (Score 1) 753
Fortunately, if they do, there's Status-4-Evar to bring it back. Now if only there was a way to bring back the modal search dialog....I really hate the new search bar.
Fortunately, if they do, there's Status-4-Evar to bring it back. Now if only there was a way to bring back the modal search dialog....I really hate the new search bar.
My first thought is that China will get it. It might help them a great deal.
They actually used a question mark, so it's not technically incorrect, unlike all the headlines that say "somebody to do something" when the article or even summary says "might", "considering", or just "thinking about".
I'm getting tired of all these posts saying "some entity to do something" when the summary says "proposed".
Assuming that "to" means "going to" to everybody else as it does me, I'd appreciate it if the editors could stop doing or allowing that.
MS BOB on a server...that seriously makes me LOL.
LOLBOB.
How can people on Slashdot bitch about software patents, and then complain about Chinese theft of software?
Copyrights and patents are different things you know...
Please enlighten us! I don't understand what takes so long and neither does anybody else it seems. I always assumed that it was just yanking copyrighted stuff & recompiling, with no testing necessary.
This sort of makes sense to me....a million flowers won't overload your nose and partially incapacitate you, but a giant spotlight on your eyes or a jumbo jet next to your ear will.
It's my understanding that some fundamental particles (like the photon and electron) have no internal structure or volume - a point charge, and thus no 3D.
Whoaaah buddy. None of that seemed right to me. You're going to need some citations.
I said the same thing when Firefox came out, and I still do. Seamonkey FTW.
The sentence he quoted references the tailless design.
Those who can, do; those who can't, write. Those who can't write work for the Bell Labs Record.