Somehow I knew that this was going to be the NYT complaning about 4chan and uncivil speech
coming from certain types of people and not all uncivil speech, of course.
If you're at all familiar with the "social justice" crowd, you probably know that they don't believe that the
rules of civility apply to them. Asking them to watch their language or to be considerate is usually
denounced as attempts to "control" them and to "silence" them. Those who are the targets of their policing,
the ones whom they "call out", though, are just supposed to sit there, shup up and listen while the "approved trolls"
from the social justice world dress them down.
This is of course understood already by many on slashdot. I saw a commenter abvove approve of trolling by
followers of the flying spag monster. That's fine actually but I wonder if the commenter is also ok with trolling by the
those who wish to defend christianity in vigorous manner. I rethorically wonder, that is.