Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Submission Summary: 0 pending, 9 declined, 8 accepted (17 total, 47.06% accepted)

×
Graphics

Submission + - Computational Photography Further Blurs Reality

kdawson writes: (From the see-it-when-I-believe-it department) We're already wary of trusting that photos we see online or in print represent unaltered, unmanipulated reality. Techniques of computational photography that have been demonstrated at graphics conferences show how the lighting in a room, the position of the camera, the point of focus, and even the expressions on people's faces can all be chosen after the light is captured. The moment that the picture so beautifully captures may never have actually happened. The article calls this development "arguably the biggest step in photography since the move away from film."
Google

Submission + - What Would Google Decide?

kdawson writes: "Gary Stock, the guy who invented the Googlewhack, tried a bit of Google election predicting last night. Using a methodology that is entirely indefensible, and which he does not try to defend, Stock asked Google to call the results on Michigan's five referendum questions. The result: Google's answers to two questions were spot-on, two questions were answered correctly but underrepresented the 'yes' vote, and one question was reversed. An 80% accuracy rate has got to beat any number of the pollsters and pundits who have been shouting at us since last August, no?"

Slashdot Top Deals

And it should be the law: If you use the word `paradigm' without knowing what the dictionary says it means, you go to jail. No exceptions. -- David Jones

Working...