Comment Re:Slashdot in 2010 (Score 1) 142
Did we get there by getting older?
Did we get there by getting older?
I'm a long time user of Mozilla, later on Firefox. Sort of. Because I've been using it mostly as Galeon - lightweight browser which uses Mozilla's renderer.
That being said it does not matter to me that much how many features Firefox has or does not have. Galeon feature set (and Feirefox renderer abilities) matters most to me. And while Galeon is something like "dead" for few years (no new features, only minor maintenance tweaks to get it running with newer Firefox releases), I have to say that my browsing needs seems to be stable for now and I'm satisfied.
But there is one big concern growing: library bundling by Firefox. It's against Fedora packaging policies, it's against what I consider good software engineering. Coupled with slower "inivation", why would I want to destabilize my whole desktop just to get slowly evolving Firefox?
So, either Firefox goes to its roots or I have to look for another browser.
Chrome is bundling forked libraries too, so out of question for me. That leave WebKit based browsers.
So, we'll see.
That seems quite logical and, consequently, should drive people to buying over the counter.
Or negotiate and demand same rights for the downloaded software in the EULA (or something) and do not buy downloads without those same right granted "in writing".
So, will Science become some kind of secret, underground guild in the US?
How then they plan to maintain their position of global bully and thus their standard of living?
Because with a lot of manufacturing (and more recently also some R&D) being moved out of US, what else can they use to maintain their status?
To protect "ideas", they (US) still need physical power.
And if they do have physical power to enforce their "ideas" world-wide, they can lower the costs and improve earnings by simply dropping the "creative business" altogether. Replacing it by simple "protection service": you pay us and we do not beat you up.
So
Is there any relation between Novel's problems and Novel's "friendship" with Microsoft?
Something like
patent pending, copyright, TM,
IIRC in some book from Peter F. Hamilton, set in Commonwealth Universe, there is a composer from alien world visiting an artificial human habitat controlled by powerful A.I.
Essentially same question has been raised in this post has been asked in the book by the composer character when talking with the A.I., something like:
- it took me few month to compose this, can you compose something like that too?
- yes
- can you do it quicker?
- yes
- then why you wanted me to do it if you can do it as good as I and much quicker?
Well, I recommend finding that book and read it - much better than me trying to remember and reproduce the argument.
If I understand and remember correctly, regulation is the culprit of your current local monopolies. So you want more regulation to solve that?
If you want "customers" to be able to "go somewhere else", you need to create some competition. I think you can get that if you allow anybody to put fiber in the ground with only regulation being "do not destroy our property" and "the net gain for us - customers - have to be positive too".
I assume those people got better deal from you so I guess it was not bad for them that your competitor shared his contact list.
Well, people who do not understand the issue might not be involved intellectually, but they are involved physically.
Certainly true for global climate which is affecting everyone not taking into account how much any of us understand the issue.
They should have set-up their own web server and post the content there. And set the authentication, limits, controls,
At least that was the original idea of The Web and that's why the Mosaic browser contained also a web page editor included by default.
But then
Well, they've got what they paid for.
I have a theory. I have to warn you in advance, they it might get labelled as "conspiracy theory". But just because you are paranoid does not mean they are not after you. So such label will be given ONLY by people who would like to hide the truth from us. The truth, that this theory of mine is actually true.
So, here we go:
This 22-year-young man, lets call him Mark, is in reality a secret agent of Russian federation, gathering secret "intel" for them from US officials. But he works "two ways" - he's also supplying both US and Russian secrets to Kuba, because he is a real communist. And Mark is also ecological activist, human right fighter (yes, just one, I can't tell you which one), he's supporting legalization of dangerous drugs and 3D RPS games, he's pro choice, he's gay and some other stuff. Almost like some twisted superhero.
And the FBI, well, they are trying to protect us from such twisted figures. Hero or not, he's twisted so they have to somehow take him off-line. It is hard to take down a super-hero. So they have to use some super-powers of theirs: "prove" him a paedophile - nobody will then touch him and they can do to him anything they want. Like, put him in jail, etc.
But please, keep that only between us. You know, secret super-weapons tend to loose their power when just anybody knows about them.
:)
"Engineering without management is art." -- Jeff Johnson