Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Answers and Suggestions and Further Questions (Score 1) 249

Most big technology companies like IBM really aren't interested in enforcing patents like this. It costs them $25000 to patent something. It could cost millions should they develop a technology based on something that is already patented or that could be patented and have to fight a lawsuit. Most of the time they are just protecting themselves. They patent everything under the sun that they can get through the USPTO and use them defensively. They can't go searching through the patent database because if they do happen to find something that is similar to something they are working on the lawsuit could cost them millions more in punitive damages because they were aware of the patent. I feel like it would be a waste of time to pursue this patent. It feels like a kick in the nuts if they are truly infringing but really it probably won't amount to anything. On the other hand if they think there could be a serious legal challenge they are likely to settle quickly rather than make a big deal out of it.

Comment I want (Score 1) 245

This is completely ridiculous. You are paying multiple times for multiple services. Plain and simple. If you really want to solve this problem get rid of all unlimited plans and charge per megabyte. You'll get exactly what you pay for.

Google

Is Cloud Computing the Hotel California of Tech? 250

Prolific blogger and open source enthusiast Matt Asay ponders whether cloud computing may be the Hotel California of tech. It seems that data repositories in the form of Googles and Facebooks are very easy to dump data into, but can be quite difficult to move data between. "I say this because even for companies, like Google, that articulate open-data policies, the cloud is still largely a one-way road into Web services, with closed data networks making it difficult to impossible to move data into competing services. Ever tried getting your Facebook data into, say, MySpace? Good luck with that. Social networks aren't very social with one other, as recently noted on the Atonomo.us mailing list. For the freedom-inclined among us, this is cause for concern. For the capitalists, it's just like Software 1.0 all over again, with fat profits waiting to be had. The great irony, of course, is that it's all built with open source."
It's funny.  Laugh.

Monty Python 40 Years Old Today! 298

cheros was one of several readers to note that today, Oct 5, in 1969 was the very first airing of Monty Python. Although not every sketch has aged particularly well, you'd be hard pressed to find a more influential and funny show. Heck, look at the Icon we use here to indicate humorous stories! Who among us can't claim to have viewed the Holy Grail at least somewhere in the double digits.

Comment Re:Guilty. (Score 1) 354

If he was working for defense, then he was working for defense, regardless of whether he was on contract or an employee or if his company was selling goods that were considered to have possibly uses as a weapons(and even if they don't). Everything is subject to export control laws. Everything. http://www.bis.doc.gov/licensing/exportingbasics.htm
I work for a software security company. We have to watch training videos frequently to be reminded of the export control laws. You can't even talk about your products to foreign nationals without a permit. And yes, information is considered an export. In fact, just taking the laptop out of the country with that information was a violation.

Slashdot Top Deals

"Engineering without management is art." -- Jeff Johnson

Working...