Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Can't the Brits get it right? (Score 1) 490

It's the ammo used. The Brits used 9mm or similar caliber ammunition. Most if not all 3D printed guns fired successfully in the US and Canada used .22LR. Not an ideal caliber for defense, but far better than nothing. The plastics currently in common used simply can't take the pressure of standard hangun calibers. But as a last ditch single shot weapon a .22 is better than nothing. This video is pure propaganda. Trying to scare off people from printing their own untraceable undetectable guns. Perhaps .22 LR isn't readily available in the UK? But this does not prove these are not viable. Just that the British authorities are so worried about losing control over the serf's abilities to defend themselves that they have taken to making propaganda vids to scare them into remaining helpless.

Guns and ammo are very difficult to get hold of legally in the UK. Even .22LR. In fact, outside of a military base I haven't seen a gun of any kind in the UK for years.

It's possible to get one or two types of gun, like say a double barrel shotgun, but that's about it. It's also a huge pain in the arse to get the necessary permits from the police who also have the right to pull short notice "inspections" of your property where the weapons are stored and often revoke permits on the spot for the silliest little thing that the officer inspecting perceives as "wrong".

Comment Re:More Cold War Waste (Score 1) 174

oh, do you have a date for when the switch over was?

No, you don't do you. So how can you tell?

No, I don't. But reading the article would give you some indication that it was a relatively recent thing. Reading/comprehension are underrated skills. Then again, so is the ability to spell and proofread properly, judging by my previous post!

Comment Re:More Cold War Waste (Score 4, Insightful) 174

...this is an example of quick recognition and response to a problem.

um, no. How can you call it quick recognition when we're talking about cold-war era waste and products from decades ago and the only reason they realized something was wrong was because of an 'explosion'?

It can be called "quick recognition" because it actually was "quick recognition" of a problem that simply didn't happened before the new litter was used.

Comment Re:Too bad Samsung's XP941 is 2/3 the price (Score 1) 113

Seriously the XP941 is a native PCIe controller, not multiple SATA controllers raided together with a PCIe bridge controller. As a result, it is almost 1/2 the price, and still has similar performance (it is only a PCIe 1x device that does 1.2GBs reads/writes, vs the PCIe 4x device that only does 1.8GBs).

Pretty sure that it's a PCIe 2.0 x4 device. :)

To quote Mr Cole, "You can get more of what you want with a kind word and a bit of 2x4 than you can with just a kind word." B5.

Comment Re:questionable commenting (Score 1) 204

Parent seems unable to distinguish between his own non-expert opinion and the opinion (true or not) of an expert with long history in the study of this subject matter.

If parent can think of a criticism, it's a safe bet the author has heard it before and believes it has been addressed. Unless parent has evidence that the author is unaware of these concerns, or intentionally misleading the reader of the article, he is just being arrogant.

The fact that it looks like a glaring hole to you (non-expert) doesn't mean it really is.

While I'm no nuclear engineer, I have heard that Alvarez has a rather poor reputation in nuclear circles.

Comment Re:I don't know but there for Aliens. (Score 1) 152

In addition, any civilization THAT advanced would undoubtedly be able to get better efficiency out of their reactors before zipping away.

My guess is they'd also be running reactors that could use the fuel up more or less completely, resulting in far less spent fuel being produced, if any.

Comment Re:Encrypted? (Score 1) 186

other than that I have nothing to hide

Imagine your full browsing history, for example. I bet there is a lot of things that you would not like others to see.

I delete it regularly anyway so that would not be a major concern for me. So I watch porn, visit Arrse (an unofficial British military forum), browse wikipedia, come on slashdot aaaand that covers what, 3/4 of my browsing? Nothing too concerning there.

Comment Re:Darned Heartbleed (Score 0) 50

That's crazy talk. We live in an era of virtual machines, separate browser instances, deep freeze, noscript, Linux..... there's absolutely no compelling reason to give up porn in the name of security.

This. If one on the internet at all, then one is exposed. The only way to be sure heartbleed won't affect a computer is to isolate it from the internet. Mod this guy up!

Slashdot Top Deals

The only possible interpretation of any research whatever in the `social sciences' is: some do, some don't. -- Ernest Rutherford

Working...