Comment Re:Not on my watch (Score 1) 224
Its really not the fact you have a few inventions under your belt, I like that. I have 3 people who work for me that have patents in their name. Those 3 guys don't have a patent in the field we work in, so there is no expectation on my part that I have to use it and none on theirs that I'll try something shady to get access to them. They have all helped work on patents for the company and their prior experience just made it that much easier to get done. For me, it would come down to what makes more sense... Hire you or license your patent? I am more than likely not going to do both unless you are absolutely the most amazing candidate I've ever seen and I need you and your patent to do what I need done. Honestly, I'd be more likely to just license the patent if I needed it. Why? It gives me more options than just hiring you and because I don't have to worry about being put in a position where I HAVE to license it. I personally don't like fucking around, fucking people over or being fucked over and this kind of situation leads to one of those situations happening.