Comment Re:Abusiveness is just a hobby. (Score 1) 388
That's not quite true: they're very good at alienating their customers - and, apparently, their employees.
That's not quite true: they're very good at alienating their customers - and, apparently, their employees.
The 4icu.org rankings are based on popularity, with one of the factors being Google's page rank. That's hardly a valid way to judge a university, unless you're judging their web sites.
One thing interesting that isn't mentioned specifically: This work, using "optical tweezers", is based on research done by Nobel Laureate Steven Chu's group at Berkeley. Dr. Chu also happens to currently be the US Secretary of Energy.
No job too big, no job too small, Steve Chu does 'em all.
I would think that very early on in his career, he may have realized that he works in a realm where very few people can be taught what he's currently working on. He may feel it's a better use of his time to push out the boundaries of knowledge, and let other folks do the teaching.
I've met a number of physics Nobel Prize winners, and very few of the theoreticians were good teachers. Feynman was an outlier
I just bought my wife an HP dv7t 17" laptop. Quad core, 2.0GHz Intel, 6GB RAM, 320GB HD, and a gigabyte ATI video card. She loves it. But it costs $1350, weighs a ton, and I think this model is being discontinued (though I'm not sure of that).
On the other hand, I love my MacBook, and the unibody MacBook Pros. For me, after the processor speed, the max memory spec is the most important. Nowadays, don't settle for less than 8GB max. Both the HP and the MacBook Pros max out at 8GB RAM. I haven't seen anything other than the core i7's carrying more.
I just re-read your question (RTFA). FAT32 is your first mistake. RAID instead of backup is your second. Your data is more at risk from a users' actions than from hardware failure (given a burn-in period). Figure out how much work you can afford to lose, then use that to create a schedule to backup to some other media, be it disk or tape, that you can take offline.
They've been doing RAID in hardware for quite some time now - the hardware may fail, but I don't think it'll mess up your data. Think of it this way: The hardware controller only has to do one thing, which is to serve RAID. The OS, on the other hand, has to do a bunch of things, any one of which could go bad and kill your RAID.
I've done both hardware and software RAID-1 in the past, with Windows, Solaris, OS X, and Linux. For Windows, go for the hardware RAID.
I still remember John Kemeny's "BASIC" plate from when he was the president of Dartmouth College.
The moon is made of green cheese. -- John Heywood