"I'll come right out and suggest that this is because it would lead you to an uncomfortable conclusion."
- No. I reject that the use of force against a passive Peaceful assembly acceptable. Ever. A person on my couch is committing a criminal act. A person occupying a public place is engaged a civil act. The criminal, I cannot ignore or tolerate safely. The civil protestor... I can safely walk around and avoid.
--
"The only? I think you are not being fair... and never issued any kind of goal or agenda."
-False. "more and better jobs, more equal distribution of income, bank reform, and a reduction of the influence of corporations on politics." [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occupy_movement] This "what do they want" line of rationalization has been disingenuous and pandering since it first emerged as the primary media meme to discredit the movement.
--
"Now you are twisting my words. I don't support the intentional harm of a peaceful demonstrator. I do support the forced removal of people in certain situations..."
-You twist your own words. You don't support intentional harm... but you do. Because... reasons.
--
"I'd rather not take the step of arresting people for silly crimes like staying in a park overnight, but it is a crime depending on the locality."
-We shouldn't, perhaps, expand the dialogue to question *why and how* those laws exist and begin working toward changing them into laws which support and affirm our rights.
--
"You keep saying things like that, without suggesting how you would move someone who is uncooperative without the risk of injury.
-Arrest the dangerous criminal. Do not move someone simply because they are uncooperative. Is it inconvenient? It's supposed to be.
--
"In some cities the law enforcement got out of hand. In others the clearing operations went off without a hitch."
-7000 arrests [http://stpeteforpeace.org/occupyarrests.sources.html], numerous (too numerous to readily quantify) injuries, many instances of abuse of power by law enforcement [http://www.buzzfeed.com/mjs538/violent-pictures-from-occupy-wall-street-protests]
--
It's far from simple, but the true complications reflect the system, not the protestors.
I wish that I had more time to put into articulating these responses, because this exchange is a good one... All apologies for the odd formatting, but I think that the statements I'm attempting to put together are fairly clear =)