I remember how excited I was to buy a Vulcan 100MB internal hard drive/power supply for my Apple IIgs computer. You had to replace the power supply with the Vulcan because the Apple IIgs was not designed for internal components the size of shoe.

It only set me back about $600 at the time.

At least we know the name of this scheme. It's called "Embrace, extend, extinguish".

But perhaps that's not what this is about. Maybe it's a new evil scheme. "Embrace, extend, own"?

Comcast simply will not accept being second place in the competition for the worst company in existence.

Actually, going under the large shelf of boob provides enough coverage and you can continue to hold both hands on your phone. Which is where you obviously want them.

I never said it was easy. =)

For the last couple of years I have been completely covering any input I give to a phone unlock or ATM PIN given. With cameras everywhere, this was only a matter of time.

Find yourself a good Seedbox out of the country.

Considering that this article seems to be a precursor to "The Internet of Things" acceptability campaign, I think I agree with your sentiment the most.

Are they hiring?

Can you demonstrate that being unconscious is a more pleasant death than being conscious.

Just because people have convinced themselves that something is better doesn't make it so. Experience belongs to those that have it. Studying blood and brainwaves and chemicals may make the observer feel better about the experience. But it doesn't tell you anything about how the actual act was experienced.

Guillotine. The most humane method humanity ever invented.

My car sits in the sun for 8 hours per day. While I'm at work.

Our government does not have higher moral in this regard. They want the same thing. They are fortunately just a tiny bit less capable of pulling off what Putin can pull off.

I can't seems to stop a suspicion from forming in the back of my mind that somewhere someone is trying to shift blame on the recent news of anti-trust behavior onto the one guy who is no longer here. Doesn't it take 2 to tango? In this very news story, I read that Google was complicate in the scheme of preventing a competitive job market. So let's report on the story that should be reported, please -- Who in Google is going to jail over this?