Comment Obvious, but serious question (Score 1) 809
Could somebody, who is hopefully familiar with corporate law, explain how this could possible hold up in court against an antitrust complaint?
Could somebody, who is hopefully familiar with corporate law, explain how this could possible hold up in court against an antitrust complaint?
Go to Mpix, or a similar vendor. I use MPix for a variety of reasons. They are fairly cheap, the paper is Kodak archival quality and the color's are far superior to any home "lab" printer you can purchase.
Your signature is awesome!
Questions of this nature are logical fallacies because there is an implicit assumption of guilt in them.
There is a book dedicated to this very subject.
http://www.nature.com/embor/journal/v4/n1/full/embor723.html
James Loewen's books, are some of the best that I ever read. Lies my Teacher Told Me starts off with the story of him and a few school districts suing to get his book on the history of Miss. adopted. Fascinating and disheartening stuff.
It is amazing the damage that a few phuqtards with ignorant beliefs can have. I always shake may head in amazement at the evolutionary naysayers. I have found that asking them how antibiotic resistant strains of bacteria have come about so quickly usually shuts them up.
If it weren't for the fact that they say that the genetic test are normal I would have a theory. My theory is that she may not have the proper receptors. For example, in the case of testicular feminisation, a person has a genetic defect in where there are no testosterone receptors. As a result, what little estrogen is in their system works like gang-busters, because there is nothing to counteract it. Because of this, the general medical recommendation is to have the undeveloped male genitalia removed and have them grow up to be women.
It is fascinating stuff though.
In the book "The making of the Atomic Bomb" the author, Richard Rhodes, points out something very much like this.
One might think that the distribution of Nobel Prize winning physicists might have a normal distribution, but there is a valley in Hungary (if I remember the book correctly) that has an inordinate amount of Nobel Prize winners.
He makes the case that their elementary level education had a role in this. Students were doing inventive things on their own in math and science at a very early age. As a result, a more natural and internal approach to these subjects followed them through life and put them in a better position to do ground-breaking research.
By the way, if you have not read "The Making of the Atomic Bomb" I highly recommend it. Not just because of its account of the events of the Manhattan Project, but also because it goes into the philosophy of the 1800's which resulted in the pursuit of bigger, better weapons to rage "Total War". The chemical weapons of WWI were a result of this as well.
Mark Russinovich, runs a website called sysinternals.com, which is now hosted by Microsoft. You might remember him as the person who discovered the Sony Rootkit.
He has a bevy of cool tools, though I think the best are:
procmon
regmon
filemon
Homeboy Russinovich is not afraid of a little assembler. These tools kick ass. The show you every process and their parent child relationship, every file, and every registry key that is being accessed.
As you can imagine filemon and regmon can generate a butt-load of output, and it may take a while to go through, but whenever I have had a problem that required this amount of horsepower I am always happy to sift through the output for the needed gems.
It's a naive, domestic operating system without any breeding, but I think you'll be amused by its presumption.