Not even a facebook profile would completely convince me. But the audio file, and that you were on a radio station that I listen to often(I'm actually from Seattle too), is proof enough. Usually I'm just skeptical to be skeptical and it only allows me to be more confident about the conclusions I draw. I'm sorry I have to take such an incredulous stance, but it's in my nature.

Congrats on achieving so much so early in life though. I'm sure we'll all hear about a lot more of your achievements down the road. That is unless you plan on retiring or something :P

The problem with your analogy is that even the cancer patient is probably uncertain whether he or she really wants to die. To end your own suffering would be hard. Especially because you usually wouldn't want to be in that position in the first place. Accepting that your life is over due to bad luck and ultimately deciding to end it all has to be an extremely confusing situation to be in. And when in your in such an ambivalent state and your doctor gives you that subtle suggestion to kill yourself, you might take it as the medically correct thing to do. The acceptance of suicide can be seen as a subtle way of promoting it, which might influence many people, especially those in vulnerable and impressionable states, to commit suicide when they "normally" wouldn't want to. It's probably better to keep suicide illegal just so that the taboo persists. After all, it's not a very enforceable law. If you want to die, it's not that hard to kill yourself in a fairly painless way (though I've never put much thought into how).

He's going for command line! TAKE HIM OUT!!!

It all depends on your definition of malicious. Or more accurately, a bunch of politicians', who know absolutely nil about computer science, definition of malicious.

I don't think axes are considered "software"

Might as well just ban paper and any form of note-taking while they're at it. We're about 27 years late anyway.

And that's the same exact pic of "Anonymous Male Teen" that's on /.'s summarized article, which is also the same as the guy's twitter account. And this is basically the same exact article, you've provided no additional information. I still think this kid doesn't exist.

Luckily for journalists, that little thing called a question mark lets you make big claims without actually "declaring" anything ;)

And for that matter, what do they mean by "Golden". Are hackers using gold computers now? Did they give up on those diamond computers they were developing?

I just don't get this figurative language stuff.

Is it even legal to alter the data of a licensed file? If Apple were to use the metadata to identify the file, then changing that metadata could be seen as a form of "circumventing copy-protection software". I'm not saying this is reasonable at all. But I'm sure that most /.ers are aware of some of the exploitation of vaguely defined laws that goes on in copyright court. If it's possible, and it generates profit, then there's reason to fear it.

My argument simply stems from my distrust of cloud computing. You're right that what I'm talking about doesn't have much to do with the actual article, I was just talking about the idea of iCloud in general. And I already said I don't know much about iCloud or what it actually does. I just know that Apple is not going to launder music for people. If there's some way to verify a file's licensing, they will. And if some kind of incriminating information comes up from checking these files, Apple is going to definitely take advantage of it. It's the equivalent of letting a cop into your home just talk and then him busting you because he found something illegal. And he would have every right to; in fact, he would see it as his "duty". I'm just saying that it's probably not a good idea to let Apple anywhere near the pirated music you may have on your computer.

This iCloud thing (haven't heard much about it, I don't follow apple products) just sounds like a way for Apple to legally collect information on stupid music pirates (and probably who has ripped back-ups on their computer) that they can sell to record companies. It's like Steve Jobs saw the South Park episode "Human CentiPad" and figured it would be a good idea to coax people into unknowingly agreeing to let Apple screw over. This program is going to scan your files with the pretense that everything is legal. But of course if it finds anything that doesn't have a proper license it's probably illegal, and therefore Apple would be "inclined" to report to the authorities.

I had the same feeling when I read this. I just don't understand how any kid could even find the time to become so fluent in so many technical areas. Unless of course his parents force fed him source code since he was an infant; which is probably the case if he is a real person. But this whole thing does seem like it's some sort of advertising conspiracy for ActiveState and their new program (which they probably developed). I checked out the kids twitter account and it does seem like it's written by a 35 year old senior programmer working for some large company. Perhaps this is just an internet personality created by some basement dwelling code monkey seeking attention. I wonder if any reporters have actually done an interview with him on video or at least audio.