There is such a thing; they are called Physician's Assistant, or PA for short. They can do nearly everything a doctor can do, including prescribe most medications. The education requirements are significantly less than that for an MD.

Considering that they just announced a loss of 1.7 BILLION and their CEO resigned, I think 5 years is optimistic. BB will be out of business much sooner than that.

This is really a question of your priorities, and a little bit about whether you think your current company is likely to be successful; I say that because a small company generally has much better growth potential, but also a much higher chance of failing.

Personally I think the pay rise you mention is pretty small change. The convenience of the commute is nice. But it seems to me much more important to ask yourself if the new/bigger company offers you a better career opportunity than your existing one. Another important consideration is the personal relationships you have at your current position. In my 25+ years in software, those relationships have been far and away more important than any other consideration.

News flash: convenience trumps security and leads to data breach/leakage.
Our other top story: dog bites man; film at 11.

Dude. Nice nerd honeypot!

Much as I'd like to see this myself, the brief window of time that AGP existed, means it will never happen.

Ah, but you are so wrong. Try a google search on "entropy gathering". There are well known ways to generate truly random sequences without any "special" hardware, using environmental noise collected from device drivers and other sources. There are Linux distros whose /dev/random implementations use these techniques. On other Unixen the EGD (Entropy Gathering Daemon) provides random sequences in a similar way.

See the Wikipedia article on /dev/random for more info.

The thing is, merely pointing a gun at a police officer is a felony. I don't think "I was just firing warning shots" would be considered a valid defence.

On the other hand, this laissez faire approach has apparently damaged your ability to spell.

..and all that shows is that you are an insufferable demagogue that would have eventually been driven away by some minor annoyance anyway. They just saved all the customer service time they would have wasted on you, at essentially no cost to them at all.

Sneaky, underhanded, devious behavior is not necessarily a sign of superior intellect. It is a strategy, one of many, that might be used to counter superior physical strength.

Another strategy might be superior training, such as the use of a martial art. Or attempt to improve communication, so that the conflict can be resolved with a win/win.

Or simply avoid the conflict altogether, if possible.

Claiming that "I am devious in my dealings with you because I am more intelligent than you" merely demonstrates that you have poor ethical judgement. A devious strategy might be justified, or it might not be.

...or you're easily amused. Just sayin'

There is already a much better approach than this in use for crypto; it's called "entropy gathering". It basically amounts to sampling things like network traffic, mouse movements, &etc and using the "noisy" bits of that data plus some math to induce randomness that is unpredictable and unrepeatable.

The problem with your approach, and anything that depends purely on an algorithmic processing of data that others can access, is that it is repeatable, given the data and the algorithm. With entropy gathering the data seeding the algorithm would be extremely difficult to re-capture after the fact.

It's called "Burning Man".

What about the ones who voted for him the second time but not the first? Remember he got more of the popular vote the second time.