Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:disclosure (Score 1) 448

Bullshit. Papers directly supported by funding/grants should, and usually do, thank/credit the sources. But just because someone funded you for one thing doesn't mean you have to disclose that in every paper you write that is remotely related.

Papers directly supported by funding/grants usually don't thank/credit sources (or maybe it's just so small that I never noticed it?).

It's de rigueur, and honest funding sources expect you to credit them.

In my field it's usually a paragraph right before the references cited. Sometimes there is also a Conflict of Interest statement, which I think is required by certain journals.

Comment Re:I'm so blue... (Score 2) 99

nteresting to note the map also looks like the city lights maps.

Interesting that they both show a sharp verticle divide right down the center of the country. When I first saw it on the light pollution maps it was so sharp that I wondered whether it was a time-of-photo artifact.

Comment Re:Attractive proposition (Score 1) 288

I've always been inclined to dismiss the existence of infinities outside of mathematics, but it's starting to look like the universe might be infinite in extent, and probably is infinite in the forward direction of time, so I'm starting to entertain the possibilities.

Though the idea of a universe infinite in extent arising from a point or a very small space is kind of hard to wrap your head around.

Slashdot Top Deals

8 Catfish = 1 Octo-puss

Working...