So why doesn't Ekstra Bladet just publish a "Ekstra Bladet Web Browser" app instead of a "Ekstra Bladet Newspaper" app? Certainly Atomic Web Browser for iPad causes Apple to warn me that it might expose me to explicit content. I assume the "Ekstra Bladet Web Browser" would similarly warn me of that moral peril.
From TFA: for allowing other iPad apps (lists "German paper Bild and British The Sun") to do what they have been prevented from. Duh.
Oh yeah, it didn't, did it.
This is out of proportion. The critical pollution today is CO2 and other Greenhouse gases. Other pollutants are localized - they are "safely" stored in the ground/seabed and/or break down. Of all places to release such pollutants, the least environmental impact is releasing them at sea (the ocean has a gigantic 3 dimensional ability to absorb and "safely" store pollutants).
This is not to say pollution is not a problem, but let's keep this in perspective. It has been far more important to reduce particulate pollutions on land (vehicles and industry) than at sea; and now the next problem is CO2.
When I get into Heaven, I'm going to take all this crap straight to top management. Perhaps if He spent less mana on Marketing and more on Product Development, we wouldn't be the quarantined laughing stock of the galaxy. It's so god-damned lonely being a mutant freak.
Ah, finally I can just keep my foot on the accelerator and let the car do all the thinking.
It's just Creation v. Evolution. There is no "debate". In Genesis, God created birds (not eggs); meanwhile, the fossil records clearly shows creatures all the way back to the oceanic ancestors of chickens laying eggs long before any birds, let alone specifically chickens. Any scientist who is still "pondering" this should go hang out with Paul Davies or some other Templeton Prize winning fool.
"the two topics force respondents to choose between factual knowledge and religious beliefs."
i.e. the respondents might belief X is false even though they know X is true. That's the best description I've seen of the stupidity of religion.
Yes, so really, the population of an "advanced economy" is 10 times lower because of this factor, thus each one should be allocated 10 times the carbon emissions budget (which they can then spend on powering computers and other intelligence-multipliers like AC units and Plasma TVs). Indeed, each computer I have churning away running SETI@home is doing the work of 1000 mathematicians that never needed to be born! And my Tic-tac-toe game is simulating the minds of 10,000 politicians than never needed to be born! Talk about carbon credits!
US economy == Lawyers.
Last one off the sinking ship is a dodo. Sell.
It's a naive, domestic operating system without any breeding, but I think you'll be amused by its presumption.
