I don't think I would enjoy the drive.

And mine. There never was a world of "with many eyeballs, all bugs are shallow"

Complaining about V1 community strings makes as much sense as "discovering" that telnet is insecure.

Don't use V1 if you are concerned about this. There is no promise of security and never was.

Yes, learning another language is not hard. And to use your example, if most languages are more alike than not, why do we need another one? It's all just riffs on the same core.

I am working (until Friday) w/a group of children who download every shiny thing on the internet and throw it into production. The result is chaos and they are rather proud of it. Amazing to watch, impressive if it worked. It doesn't work, and they spend a lot of time tinkering. Oh, well. Someday they will discover girls and have better things to do. I hope.

I hope you are ready when the population of southern California moves to where the water is. Don't worry, they will bring some "cool" with them. It will have to be an improvement.

Because the search radius not thousands of miles?

How about that?

+1

Slow clap. I wish I had mod points.

Do you know where Vladivostok is? Russia not need Korea to ship gas.

You are making way too much sense. Are you lost?

Thanks for that info. I haven't had time to look.

I worked on SNMP (et al) and it was never smooth. Nobody paid any attention until v1 was out and amazingly got traction. v2 died many deaths until it was simply declared done. SNMP was/is way more than just plain vanilla MIB (which almost nobody uses), there is the "P" (for protocol) an OID encoding scheme, etc.

If you were going to create SNMP today, it would be a dedicated protocol w/OID, BER and all of that. It would be HTTP and XML (or JSON).

I am not sure there needs to be a lot of "new" protocols these days. HTTP won. Use it and move on.

Self respect. How about you?

Nobody decides to buy a BB solely based upon a hardware keyboard.

Probably could have stopped w/"nobody decides to buy a BB"