The first and foremost image comparison should be the Lenna image.

No Lenna, no approval.

Lenna forever. Long live Lenna. I am lossless without thee.

Lenna, you make my pixels huffman.

Lenna you transform my fft.

----

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lenna

Basically, this is what is going to happen:

Some ISP somewhere with a /20 is going to project that in 6 months time they will be out of IPs,
and it's going to be too expensive to buy another /20.

So they are going to buy some Cisco-hardware-NAT-appliance and say to their customers: "look here,
you are all on NAT from now on, if you want a real IP you pay extra."

This NAT box will NAT a /20 to a /24 of temp addresses+ports. It will be plug-n-play and
easier than setting up IPv6.

99.9% of customers won't read the announcement and won't notice. They are all NATing through
their DSL modems anyway, and this Cisco equipment will have hacks for all those special
apps that need it to work behind double NATing.

And no one will ever think of switching to IPv6

-paul

or you could just added an extra 32-bits as a TCP or IP header-option

if you interleave the bits, you can keep all the routing configuration

-paul

> The only thing that *fails* is when [...]

thats quite a lot of things failing.

> similar to using an NAT router

no, there are 100 million people connected to the internet using ADSL and all *their* stuff works fine

why, because NAT is a solved problem with lot's of workarounds

ergo: IPv6 is just NAT all over again

we might as well solve the IPv4 address-space problem with huge /8 NAT'd networks.

good luck to the 0.0000001% of the Internet that has "successfully" switch to IPv6 after 20 years of IPv6 promotion.

-paul

http://cr.yp.to/djbdns/ipv6mess.html

-paul

"Treated" by who?

You have to file a charge in order for there to be a crime.

The guy needs to contact the public prosecutor to get him to take up the case and get a court order in the correct jurisdiction.

It's only because he doesn't understand the legal process that he can't get his info.

-paul

You are not reading the article.

How can a judge issue a court order outside of his jurisdiction?

-paul

The company is perfectly right. The judge only refused because the guy asked the wrong judge. This is explained in the article.

The company also is being entirely cooperative and "would encourage Mr Moorhouse to go to a solicitor and start a civil case".

Through a civil case he would be able to get a court order. I don't even think he would need a lawyer for this.

This law is in line with good civil rights: it's the same law that prevents Google from disclosing info about your searches.

http://www.quackometer.net/

gives it a zero cannard rating. This means her site is not quack.

I've already complained to the quackometer.net admin about this.

-paul

So the truth finally comes out: now one gives a flying fluck.

Not even surprising enough to warrant a sarcastic choke on the next sip of my coffee.

-paul

I have the exact requirements as you, so I spent the last six months developing a
solution. It converts SentBoxes, Inboxes, gmail, PST files and regular mbox.

It archives and indexes everything and provides full text search with google-like
phrase grouping and exclude phrases.

It normalizes addresses, eliminates duplicates, understands every character set and
can display any email within it's web GUI with proper inlining of pics-in-html.

For me it can index 8 gigs of emails within a couple of hours.

We are pilot testing this solution at an ISP for our customers.

Would you like to try it out?

My email http://2038bug.com/email.gif

-paul

Whatever you do, don't make any broadcasts to alien vessels.
Also, any signals you receive from the alien's should not be made public,
or else YOU and your satelite dish will dissapear curtesy of secret UFO coverup agencies etc.

Eat this message.

-paul