Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment How does this benefit Google long-term? (Score 1) 103

I thought this would be Google's chance to kill Firefox. Not many other search providers for Mozilla to run to. Microsoft can attempt to tie IE and Bing together and Google can tie Chrome and Google search. Firefox is left out in the cold to whither and die like Netscape. Probably not good for the consumer, but such is the way of things.

Comment Re:No (fission) Nukes (Score 2) 266

How many people have died from this incident (or any nuclear-related event) compared to number of coal miners and oil rig workers who are killed each year? As far as long term health effects, like increased cancer rates, time will tell. However, let's compare that to coal miners contracting chronic lung disease and that the many deaths attributed to respiratory distress caused by air pollution. What about coal mine explosions or oil spills? Please explain to me how nuclear power is somehow more dangerous than the alternatives. Don't bother bringing hydroelectric, wind, geothermal, etc into the argument. When practical, I fully support those sources over nuclear.

Comment Re:Not this time: (Score 3, Informative) 261

The French have not won a major war in nearly 300 years in which the United States was not their ally. French-Indian / Seven Years War - lost; Napoleon - kicked major ass and wreaked havoc for years and still lost; Franco-Prussian War - lost; Algeria - lost; Vietnam - lost before the US made the same mistake. We don't even need to mention WWII, the collapse of the Republic, and the whole Vichy collaborationist thing. What's that you say? The French made a major contribution towards the American War of Independence, fought valiantly in WWI, and have been good allies to the US during wars of the past few decades? And none of that really has to to do with the US being their ally any more than the US winning wars has to do with the bit part the other nations play in our coalitions, save perhaps Britain.

Comment Re:Not this time: (Score 1) 261

During the War of 1812, Canadians (not British regulars) never crossed onto American soil and only won a single battle on Canadian soil in which the forces were primarily Canadian rather than British. Those facts notwithstanding, the American effort to invade Canada during that war was inept and embarrassing.

Comment Re:any signal can be found and killed (Score 1) 417

The Lusitania was carrying weapons, certainly. It is interesting to speculate what would've happened if the US would've stayed out of it. Not convinced the world would've been a better place, nor even that WWII wouldn't have happened around the same time period. Almost certain Hitler wouldn't have rose to power though. I'd read that book.

Comment Re:any signal can be found and killed (Score 1) 417

The millions of people living in wealthy, democratic South Korea may disagree with you. The citizens of Kuwait also may beg to differ (it was about oil, but we did some good in the process of protecting our interests). And with WWI, there was plenty of provocation. The Zimmerman telegram, the Lusitania, unrestricted submarine warfare. You could argue we were providing material to the Allies, but that applies to the run-up to WWII also. Only major actions I'd list as unjustifiably wrong are Mexican War and Spanish-American War. Iraq was more a misguided, horribly bad idea than outright evil.

Slashdot Top Deals

New York... when civilization falls apart, remember, we were way ahead of you. - David Letterman

Working...